[aerogear-dev] Quickstarts revamp..or not...
daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
Fri Aug 15 04:24:49 EDT 2014
>Today at our quickstarts, it doesn't make sense the server without an
>interface (I guess).
It might make sense if a user is only interested in testing the one of the
mobile clients but they can just ignore the webapp in that case..
>I was just wondering if we could merge both in a single project. Or
>maybe make the webapp have the server as dependency, not sure.
I guess we can do that. The only reason I can think of for having them
separated was to make the proxy quickstart a little nicer, where we could
have the backend, the webapp, and the proxy all on different machines.
So I think I'm +1 on this :)
On 15 August 2014 10:01, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> Good morning,
> Today at our quickstarts, it doesn't make sense the server without an
> interface (I guess).
> I was just wondering if we could merge both in a single project. Or
> maybe make the webapp have the server as dependency, not sure.
> Btw the name "client" for the webapp is a little bit odd to me, once it
> requires a server.
>  -
>  -
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aerogear-dev