[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Thu Aug 21 07:51:54 EDT 2014

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:

> overall I am not against changes for 1.1.x, on our master branch. Here is
> something that Sebi mentioned a few month ago:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534
> right I like this as well, but here the users data is also mixed with the
> message, that was the point.
> With some API change, coming up, let's not forget about "REST API
> Versioning", he discussed at our Face2Face meeting:
> http://oksoclap.com/p/jbrS1EHWkI
> (looks like in that session the majority preferred headers over URI).
> We have to support the 1.0.0 APIs for quite a while.
> Sure, but because we have a version can’t mean that we cannot change
> things I hope.

nah, not at all :-) That's why we discussed 'REST API Versioning' at the

> We just need to have a good mechanism inlace to maintain these versions.

yep, I'd say once that is in place, we can look at changing APIs

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140821/77fd330d/attachment.html 

More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list