[aerogear-dev] to use or not to use aerogear-ios-http as agerogear-ios-push dependency?

[Christos Vasilakis]

On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys
> 
> Since AGIOS-255 (Basic/Digest auth for aerogear-ios-http) is under review and will be merged soon, one question that pops up is: shall we use ag-ios-http lib to support push registration in Swift lib (aerogear-ios-push). So far we’ve been using plain NSURLSession to do it as it wasn’t yet ready on http lib.
> 
> I think there are two sides of it:
> - eat your own dog food
> - does it really make sense - looking at the "remove 2 lines, but will add dependency"..... sounds like does not really make sense :)
> 
> I am fine in keeping it as it is.

+1 the lesser dependencies the better, in cases where it makes sense like here I guess.

-
Christos


> 
> Thanks for the insights!
> 
> -M
> 
>  
> 
> Doing so will remove 2 lines of boiler plate code but will add a dependency (although internal to aerogear). As either ways seem fine for me, I’d like to have your views on it.
> 
> ++
> Corinne
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141201/e835b33c/attachment.html