[aerogear-dev] AeroGear.org - a first thought on changing our roadmap docs

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Dec 15 08:31:44 EST 2014


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> Speaking from the security side of the things, to me is impossible to
> have a feature driven roadmap, because it's a cross cutting concern.
>

right :-)

looking at [1] I see different types of roadmaps

1) Project roadmap
2) Platform roadmaps (e.g. Android, Cordova, iOS and JS)
3) cross cutting concerns (e.g. security)
4) specific roadmaps (E.g. UPS/WebPush or even the WebSite roadmap)


And that's fine :) For now, I'd really just like to get rid of the pages
that basically duplicate info, available on JIRA :-)




>
> About removing the roadmap from website, as long as we make it clear
> por people outside AeroGear, I'm fine.
>
> On 2014-12-15, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Hi team,
> >
> > while thinking about restructuring our roadmaps, I was wondering about
> our
> > existing roadmaps on [1]. Overall I'd like to have the AG roadmaps more
> > feature driven, but that requires some more thoughts/changes?
> >
> > However, here is what I am wondering about...
> >
> > Most of our roadmaps we link to from [1], are really just pointing to
> > different JIRAs.
> >
> >
> > Let's take one example, UPS:
> > https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/
> >
> > Basically all info on the above page is present in JIRA (including the
> > 'archived' roadmap of older releases). Since JIRA should be the central
> > tool for planing releases, features and future versions, I think that our
> > roadmap docs are not adding too much value, since they repeat info that
> is
> > available on a different place (JIRA).
> >
> > Also, maintaining the roadmaps is tedious: You make a change on the
> actual
> > JIRA (e.g. move the date of a release or add a new feature). To keep the
> > roadmap up-to-date, you put the same info on the roadmap doc and send a
> PR.
> >
> >
> > Can we remove these roadmap docs?
> >
> > For UPS that would mean, that the link on [1] would go against:
> >
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel
> >
> > instead of here:
> > https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141215/886c7c5a/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list