[aerogear-dev] Sync Day 4 Sync or Swim

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Feb 3 10:50:01 EST 2014


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

>  On 02/03/2014 10:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> So This should be all of the JIRAs (epics plus sub tasks)
>>
>>   *
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1428?jql=project%20%3D%20AEROGEAR%20AND%20component%20%3D%20data-sync%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%20-1w%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>
>>
>  If we figure out something else, or change our mind, we can always
> move/create some JIRAs.
>
>  Overall these items you created here are looking good. However I think
> the server needs a bit more definition, e.g. what type of adapters (e.g.
> Couch-Adapter, Hibernate-Adapter), assuming we agreed on this architecture,
> instead of embedding w/in an application (e.g. on-top of JPA/Hibernate)
>
> I mentioned that in response to DanBev
>
> TL;DR;  I didn't think of the server beyond "the data has to come from
> somewhere".  I heavily prefer having a protocol and a reference
> implementation that having a "you have to use this server to use this
> client" setup.  But that is still up for discussion.
>

yeah not sure on just providing an RI


>
> I feel like push struck a good balance.  We have Unified push as our
> default implementation, but it is easy to plug in your own.
>

hrm, sync based on UnifiedPush ? I was hope for this being a bit more
flexible, or optional. hrm not sure



>
>
>
>
>> Now we need to figure out things like versions, release dates, project
>> specific JIRAs, etc.
>>
>> Me PERSONALLY I think that
>>   * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1405 and
>>   * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1409
>
>
>  sounds like a good starting point
>
>
>>
>>
>> leave us in a great place for a 0.1.0 release.  It will have enough
>> stuff done that we can say "yes this a product" but isn't so feature
>> rich that we get bogged down in minutia.
>>
>> WDYT?
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140203/06222322/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list