[aerogear-dev] [sync] To pipe or not to pipe?

[Luke Holmquist]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 4, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/04/2014 03:04 AM, Corinne Krych wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I started doing demo app Buddies and Hobbies [1] (same idea than luke’s one [2]). But instead of usin gcomplete separate chanel I wrapped Pipe within SyncPipe [3]. Questions:
>> 1. looking at Luke’s work I didn’t see the usage of pipe at all.
>> 2. do we want to reuse Pipe protocol/interface for sync Pipe or use a different one?
>> I rather use the pipe underneath as we don’t want to reimplement Paging, upload etc...
>> wdyt guys?
> I don't think extending Pipe is the best idea. However, I feel that any 
> synchronizer should use pipes under the hood.
> 
> Think composition over inheritance. Also overloading the read and save 
> methods will get rather rough when we also have to check for conflicts 
> and handle responses from the server.
> 
> A SyncPipe could be the implementation the sync system works in iOS, but 
> I don't think it should be part of the spec/protocol.
> 

+1
> 
>> 
>> With our actual server [4], we need adjust to serve REST endpoint. Ugly harcoded it (for now) to serve my purpose.
>> 
>> ++
>> Corinne
>> [1] https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-ios-cookbook/tree/sync.demo.recipe/Hobbies
>> [2] https://github.com/lholmquist/ag-js-ds-poc
>> [3] https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-sync-ios
>> [4] https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-sync-server/blob/master/server/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/sync/rest/RestChannelHandler.java#L49
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev