[aerogear-dev] DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

Lucas Holmquist lholmqui at redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 10:24:58 EST 2014


On Feb 10, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 02/10/2014 08:46 AM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> So iOS and JS are at the same level of API fucntionalities and same method names.
>>> we’re just left to pick a name DataSync vs SyncPipe
>> yea,  i wasn't really thrilled with DataSync when i named it that
> Because it isn't Sync.  It is VersionControl
exactly,  Then perhaps we should be calling this first set of Milestones, Version Control client API instead of Data Sync


>>> Let’s see for the Java version
>>> 
>>> ++
>>> Corinne
>>> On 10 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have:
>>>>> 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3]
>>>>> 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4]
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments .
>>>> in JS the read method can also be "read all",  should probably update that gist
>>>> 
>>>>> @summers do you have a gist for java API?
>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> ++
>>>>> Corinne
>>>>> [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-not-to-pipe-td6135.html
>>>>> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408
>>>>> [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c
>>>>> [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list