[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush: Sending notifications from the AdminUI
Hylke Bons
hbons at redhat.com
Mon Feb 24 06:52:00 EST 2014
Sounds good.
Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
Hylke
On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <matzew at apache.org <mailto:matzew at apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some
> mobile (iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push
> notifications.
>
> Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
>
> * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV
> file, stored on a public HTTP Server.
>
> * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF)
> are available on a protected resource of a webserver (which they
> _can_ than download from w/in the app, if the like to)
>
> The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send
> new push messages, when ever their customers want to.
>
> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc
> example (iOS / backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server.
> Especially that it does store all the device metadata.
>
> But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend
> requirement, they would still have to use their own console (which
> than connects to UPS) for submitting all the push messages they want.
>
>
>
> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should
> implement that feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our
> UnifiedPush Server allows its users to simple send push messages
> to all of their mobile apps, it would make the server even more
> attractive.
>
> I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I
> guess that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you
> typically find complex setups, and server talk to servers :-(
>
> Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send
> push' facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could
> reach way more potential users with something like that
>
> +9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will
> try to submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I
> have quickly a first working version on master.
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
>
> [AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140224/fc2a3afd/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list