[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush: Sending notifications from the AdminUI

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Tue Feb 25 04:22:15 EST 2014


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello Sebi
>
> Great idea!
> Would it be possible to have a dropdown box for all possible variants?
>
:) Sure, I had that in a previous version I worked on this morning,  but
for simplicity for now I just choosed the  "Free text" option for all the
criterias. Later we will make that nicer

++
> Corinne
> On 25 Feb 2014, at 10:06, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page. The idea is that you
> can add criterias to your message , as you can see here on this screenshot :
> >
> > I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER* this is just UI /
> Mockup work sending will not work for now :
> http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com  => Select an App and you will have a
> "Copomse Message" link on the next page.
> >
> > Feedback is welcome.
> > Sebi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Sounds good.
> > Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
> > Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.
> > What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push Message"
> feature.
> >
> > We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send the
> message. I really like for instance how Jira do that like here
> http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
> > In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device
> Type", "Alias" and "Categories"
> > And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hylke
> >
> >
> >
> > On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some mobile
> (iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push notifications.
> >>
> >> Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
> >>
> >> * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV file,
> stored on a public HTTP Server.
> >>
> >> * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF) are
> available on a protected resource of a webserver (which they _can_ than
> download from w/in the app, if the like to)
> >>
> >> The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send new
> push messages, when ever their customers want to.
> >>
> >> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc
> example (iOS / backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server.
> Especially that it does store all the device metadata.
> >>
> >> But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend requirement,
> they would still have to use their own console (which than connects to UPS)
>  for submitting all the push messages they want.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should implement
> that feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our UnifiedPush Server
> allows its users to simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps,
> it would make the server even more attractive.
> >>
> >> I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I guess
> that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you typically find
> complex setups, and server talk to servers :-(
> >>
> >> Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send push'
> facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could reach way more
> potential users with something like that
> >> +9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will try
> to submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I have
>  quickly a first working version on master.
> >>
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >> [AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140225/921a4b91/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list