[aerogear-dev] Compose Push UI - draft (was: Re: UnifiedPush: Sending notifications from the AdminUI)

Wed Feb 26 04:15:35 EST 2014

Hi,
An update : here the latest screenshot of the current UI :

And also now you can test it for real since I deployed a new version that
manage the sending :  : http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com  (admin /123)

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:

> Hello Sebi,
>
> that looks really nice!
>
> Hylke can you take a look at the first version, from a UX persons view?
>
> Thanks!
> Matthias
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page. The idea is that you
>> can add criterias to your message , as you can see here on this screenshot
>> :
>> [image: compose2]
>>
>

> I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER* this is just UI /
>> Mockup work sending will not work for now :
>> http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com  => Select an App and you will have a
>> "Copomse Message" link on the next page.
>>
>> Feedback is welcome.
>> Sebi
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Sounds good.
>>>> Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
>>>>
>>> Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.
>>> What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push Message"
>>> feature.
>>>
>>> We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send the
>>> message. I really like for instance how Jira do that like here
>>> http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
>>> In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device
>>> Type", "Alias" and "Categories"
>>> And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hylke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>  over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some
>>>>> mobile (iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push notifications.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
>>>>>
>>>>>  * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV
>>>>> file, stored on a public HTTP Server.
>>>>>
>>>>>  * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF)
>>>>> are available on a protected resource of a webserver (which they _can_ than
>>>>> download from w/in the app, if the like to)
>>>>>
>>>>>  The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send
>>>>> new push messages, when ever their customers want to.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc
>>>>> example (iOS / backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server.
>>>>> Especially that it does store all the device metadata.
>>>>>
>>>>>  But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend
>>>>> requirement, they would still have to use their own console (which than
>>>>> connects to UPS)  for submitting all the push messages they want.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should implement
>>>>> that feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our UnifiedPush Server
>>>>> allows its users to simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps,
>>>>> it would make the server even more attractive.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I
>>>>> guess that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you typically find
>>>>> complex setups, and server talk to servers :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>  Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send
>>>>> push' facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could reach way
>>>>> more potential users with something like that
>>>>>
>>>> +9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will try
>>>> to submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I have
>>>>  quickly a first working version on master.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Greetings,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  [AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140226/3a92baae/attachment-0001.html 