[aerogear-dev] sync spec strawman
Bruno Oliveira
bruno at abstractj.org
Wed Jan 8 09:37:02 EST 2014
Is just a suggestion, but if I understood correctly your previous proposal ‘checksum’ was able to check or validate outdated information. Amirite?!
Or to avoid confusion we can:
1. Get rid of checksum and make use of revisions like CouchDB does.
2. Use the checksum and get rid of revisions
3. Keep both (might exist some overlapping between two concepts)
What do you guys prefer?
--
abstractj
On January 8, 2014 at 12:13:42 PM, Summers Pittman (supittma at redhat.com) wrote:
> > And is revision a checksum now?
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list