[aerogear-dev] AeroGear January sync release postponed
Matthias Wessendorf
matzew at apache.org
Mon Jan 20 06:27:22 EST 2014
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
> > +1 on postponing to a later point. If ready by April, should be fine as
> > well (my opinion). Bruno had a good point, that the postponed release
> > should not stop us from releasing (unstable) snapshots for testing
> reasons.
> > I like that: Release often, release early.
>
> What is actually an (unstable) snapshot? Could you shed more light on that?
>
I'd say a regular snapshot, from master branch, released to the snapshot
repo
>
> Namely, is the "snapshot" a set of micro/minor releases of Aerogear
> projects?
> Or do you plan to release every Aerogear project as -SNAPSHOT? Or
> introducing
> -milestone/.Mx/alpha/beta/cr/timestamp/any-qualifier-you-like into version
> strings?
>
> I don't think 2/ option is a good idea, especially if SNAPSHOTs are
> released
> early & often. That would be a maintenance/testing nightmare, if various
> SNAPSHOTs of the same project cannot be distinguished from each other and
> used
> within other projects.
>
> Karel
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140120/4dc02860/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list