[aerogear-dev] Website restructure

Hylke Bons hbons at redhat.com
Fri Jan 24 13:08:04 EST 2014


Hey,

On 24/01/2014 14:58, Corinne Krych wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I’ve being working on sass branch [1], the same branch Erik-Jan did its initial work.
> Here is more feedback on our site redesign
>
> 1. Example page with each language code snippet
> It’s a good idea, to show the unified aspect of our libs. Having a short snippet code is great, however it’s not possible to fit the detailed example we alreday have in our documentation. Rather than simplifying and not going into details, I think we could have a main page like [2] which give the definition + each snippet. Below the code snipet I’ve added a link:
> Read more on Pipes on Android / Pipes on iOS / Paging on Web
> which points to detailled page.
>
> I think we should keep this documetation. It goes deeper in the sample code as opposed to snippet which is not necessarly complete code. One think that we could do is use code sample extracted from our cookbook recipe. So we can point to the repository for the full app code.
>
> @Hylke Do you have a better idea than just a simple link? I think it’s not visual enough. And what should be the layout of the detailled example page?

The [2] link is on localhost. :)

How about we try it out for Pipes and see how it goes? Yes, we probably 
would need to move some stuff out to other sections, but that's ok. 
We'll have a better ideas what to do with the "excess" docs once we try 
any simplify the multiple documents into one.

Here's the idea for the scopes I had:

- Examples => High level overview of AeroGear concepts and code snippets 
about how they're used. Not neccesarily big programmes.
- Documentation
   - Getting started => Download and setup
   - API Browser => just a link to the full API overview
- Guides: We can go more all out here. Tutorials, example projects, more 
complex configurations, etc. Basically everything else that doesn't fall 
into the above categories. :)

I know it's a lot of work... I do think it's the best way to go. I'd be 
happy to help out on this too, though I've absolutely no clue on the 
topic, but that may actually be a good thing for explaining stuff to 
people new to the concepts. :)


>
>
> 5. Dracula theme vs White theme
> If you uncomment [3] you can have a white theme. A shame that with Dracula theme we loose the AeroGear blue and orange logo...
> @Hylke for the dracula theme we need AG logo in each of the 3 colors.
Yes, I'll send you those. Don't worry about the theming too much, as we 
haven't really discussed that yet. The "Dracula" theme was more of an 
example of how we can use colours to mark different sections of the 
project/site. So if you'd like to see things different, let me know! :)

> 5. Menu
> @Hylke you said you want to remove the actual menu, but what do you propose to navigate between topic: Core/Security/Push/Sync
I've actually added it back in the mockup (see the other email on the 
thread). It was more of a time thing that I hadn't added it yet. It's 
back now.

Hylke


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list