[aerogear-dev] Simplify Security of AeroDoc

[Bruno Oliveira]

+1 What about make use of KC instead?

On 2014-07-22, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> +1 Less maintenance sounds good to me.
>
>
> On 22 July 2014 11:00, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All !
> >>
> >> I'm currently working on APGUSH-810[1] which consist in removing  the
> >> dependency we still had on the deprecated aerogear-security project (RIP my
> >> friend).
> >>
> >> But now, if I want to keep AeroDoc, feature equal as before, I have to
> >> add a LOT of code around security (to handle role, annotations etc ...).
> >> AeroDoc is already quite complex and time consuming to maintain and the
> >> core scope is not security but advanced Push.
> >>
> >> So ... What I would like to propose is to keep only the authentification
> >> (log in) and remove all the role handling part to simplify it.
> >>
> >> The only effect that this will introduce, is that a logged in user can
> >> also access the admin to create leads.
> >>
> >
> > that is fine w/ me
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Wdyt ?
> >>
> >> Sebi
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-810
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914