[aerogear-dev] Modularizing the Android Library

[Bruno Oliveira]

My suggestion is to make a module with just "android-auth", because
split it without knowing if it's necessary is not a good idea.

And about android-security being used for services, that makes sense.

On 2014-07-24, Daniel Passos wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> aerogear-android-security for now is only to all around KeyServices, like
> PassPhrase and KeyStore.
>
> I'm not sure if Auth and Authz will be used together. The fact is today the
> implementation is not following the same contracts, so that's the reason
> why we decided to split that.
>
> -- Passos
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Passos, what does aerogear-android-security stands for? Do we really
> > need the authz module? My question is due to the fact that mostly it
> > will be together with auth module, but I could be wrong.
> >
> > On 2014-07-22, Daniel Passos wrote:
> > > Hey Guys,
> > >
> > > Summers and I started working on agdroid modules and remove some cyclic
> > > dependencies. So we plan to split the agdroid on these modules:
> > >
> > >    - aerogear-android-core
> > >    - aerogear-android-pipe
> > >    - aerogear-android-auth
> > >    - aerogear-android-autz
> > >    - aerogear-android-store (with option security dependecy to use
> > >    EncryptedStores)
> > >    - aerogear-android-security
> > >    - aerogear-android-push
> > >    - aerogear-android-push-ups
> > >    - aerogear-android-offline
> > >
> > > -- Passos
> >

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914