[aerogear-dev] Help needed on AGPUSH-848

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 04:39:43 EDT 2014


Hi Dan,
Not sure if I understand exactly what you meant, could do a small snippet ?



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Oh I see. Then I'd say you'll need to change the return type to either use
> a custom object for the key in the map, or perhaps return a list with that
> came custom object. What ever makes the most sense in this use case. Makes
> sense?
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 09:39, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, several VariantMetricInformation instances can have the same
>> VariantID, at each send , one is created :
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fjboss%2Faerogear%2Funifiedpush%2Fmessage%2FSenderServiceImpl.java#L133
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
>> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is this because variantFour and variantFive have the same variantId
>>> (231543432434)? When added to the map only one will exist later
>>> in findTopThreeBusyVariantIDs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31 July 2014 09:20, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Morning Peeps,
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently trying to fix AGPUSH-848[1].
>>>> Basically, the number of receivers shown in the top3 list is not always
>>>> accurate.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that something is wrong with this query :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/jpa/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/jpa/dao/impl/JPAPushMessageInformationDao.java#L99-L104
>>>>
>>>> I have change this test case :
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model%2Fjpa%2Fsrc%2Ftest%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fjboss%2Faerogear%2Funifiedpush%2Fjpa%2FPushMessageInformationDaoTest.java#L251
>>>>
>>>> By adding just one VariantInformation[2] and now the test is failing
>>>> and I have no idea why, so I would aprreciate a second eye on this.
>>>>
>>>> I'm probably missing something obvious but I can not see it right now :)
>>>>
>>>> Sebi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-848
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/ea34e7f9fdafbc0785f2#file-gistfile1-java-L30-L35
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140731/550e2147/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list