[aerogear-dev] AeroGear.js without jQuery Discussion

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Mar 24 11:26:46 EDT 2014


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 10:10 AM, tolis emmanouilidis <tolisemm at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 2014-03-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I agree that it would be nice to implement AGJS-70<https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGJS-70> (Investigate
>>>> removing jQuery requirement). Meanwhile, there is an open source project on
>>>> GitHub that claims to offer a custom builder for jQuery in order to include
>>>> only the modules needed [1] [2]. I haven't tried it yet but maybe we could
>>>> create a custom jQuery build which includes only the parts currently needed
>>>> in AeroGear. This would mean a smaller size of the jQuery dependency.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The AG lib depends on a few parts of jQuery, the biggest being
>>>> jQuery.Ajax and the promise implementation.
>>>>
>>>> i know we can make custom builds of jQuery pretty easily( building from
>>>> source ),  but i don't really want to bundle it within our lib.
>>>>
>>>> and i don't think with bower we can do this easily. although they did
>>>> just add a post install hook, so perhaps that could be something to look at.
>>>>
>>>> Datamanager only uses the promise implementation of jQuery( and some
>>>> random thing for the filter method,  which could probably be updated ).
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>>  Promises are starting to become available natively in browsers and
>>>> jQuery doesn't use the Promise/A+ spec,  so it could be harder to fallback
>>>> without a shim of some kind
>>>>
>>>
>> Good to know. Thanks for providing this info.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> sounds reasonable to 'wait' on the promise side of things, and use that
>>> bit in the datamanager
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> there are other promise implementations that we could use, that are to
>> spec,  such as Q and RSVP,  here is the link to the HTML5 rocks article
>> http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/es6/promises/
>>
>
> These last days I have been playing with the library When provided by
> Cujo, it's maybe also worth looking https://github.com/cujojs/when
>

not sure I see value in using a different library as a temporary thing.
Once the API is part of the browser platform, the need for [yet another js
lib] goes away.



>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> while i don't really want to reinvent the wheel in terms of Ajax,  it
>>>> might be interesting to take a look.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Yeah, IMO worth to look there, for reducing dependencies
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>   I think in a previous ML thread about what 2.0 looked like,  that
>>>> Pipeline would maybe just be a JSON only thing, with exception for multipart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> @Lucas Thanks for making things clear
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140324/8a438c00/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list