[aerogear-dev] Modularization and Push
Miiguel Lemos
miguel21op at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 14:03:42 EDT 2014
Using the GCM for push notifications has a very important advantage: it minimizes the battery consumption, since it reduces the processor overload, it's not needed to open a socket to check the server on a regular basis, etc. In my opinion this a critical matter, minimizing the probability of the user turning the notifications off.
Enviado do meu iPad
No dia 31/03/2014, às 18:51, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> escreveu:
> I would vote for A
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> On March 31, 2014 at 10:59:01 AM, Summers Pittman (supittma at redhat.com) wrote:
>>> Y'all,
>>
>> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
>> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries
>> are
>> concerned. Additionally there have been some requests for a
>> separate
>> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
>>
>> The full modularization of the library along with several other
>> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>>
>> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
>> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before
>> we include
>> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project
>> which
>> is only a push module? This new project will get merged back into
>> the
>> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list