[aerogear-dev] AS/WF Modules location - proposing change

[Matthias Wessendorf]

+1 I agree


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for pointing that document out. I'll read through it but, this
> sounds like a good idea to me. I'll create task for SimplePush and
> UnfiedPush next based on what is agree upon here.
>
>
>
>
> On 9 May 2014 13:39, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've come across this document -
>>
>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/LayeredDistributionsAndModulePathOrganization
>> .
>> It explains how WF/EAP (since EAP 6.1.0) modules are organized.
>>
>> Based on document, I believe we should change our tutorials and ask users
>> to
>> install modules to:
>>
>> ${modules.basedir}/system/add-ons/aerogear
>> ${modules.basedir}/system/add-ons/dbs
>>
>> That would keep base clean, allowing easier update of underlying container
>> and also it will let us use the patching mechanism for our code, e.g:
>>
>> ${modules.basedir}/system/add-ons/aerogear/patches/security-fix-1
>>
>> Thoughts? Note, add-on names were randomly generated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Karel
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140512/34db6e3d/attachment-0001.html