[aerogear-dev] Angular.js branch and UPS

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Wed May 21 11:20:44 EDT 2014


I might be wrong but my understanding was that keycloak.js was needed for
pure htlm/JS web apps and not embedded with a backend like we have.


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Good morning peeps,
>
> While I was navigating at angular branch
> (
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/angular_keycloak),
> I notice
> that you guys don't make use of keycloak.js
> (
> http://docs.jboss.org/keycloak/docs/1.0-alpha-3/userguide/html_single/index.html#d4e546).
> My
> question is: why not? Or this something planned for the future?
>
> My concern is about reinvent what KC already did on the client side.
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140521/dc1211d6/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list