[aerogear-dev] Handling 1.x repositories

[Christos Vasilakis]

On Oct 7, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as we approach 2.0 releases in iOS we are evaluating the faith of our 1.x repository [1]. Currently the functionality has been splitted in separate  repositories[2][3] with more to come in subsequent releases . Since other platforms follow  the same approach of separation, would like to get your view on how you will handle the ‘1.x’ repo?
> 
> We were thinking to:
> 
> a) promote the master repo to an '1.x branch’  and update the repos README.md to be clear that is our 1.x branch
> b) use the ‘master’ branch with just a single README.md that provides links to the different repos.
> 
> Do you mean, the repo in [1] will be just a readme, linking to all the different 'modules'? If so, +1 on that

meant exactly that yes

-
Christos



>  
> 
> 
> Wdyth?
> 
> 
> -
> Christos
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios
> [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-http
> [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-oauth2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141007/85e3d990/attachment-0001.html