[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
>> since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
>>
>
> nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure
>
>
> Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic
> everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because everything is
> message payload)
>

I hear you! data is pretty generic


> can’t we use something like ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or
> perhaps something that says a little bit more to what this is.
>

Good suggestions, I do like user-data!

:)



>
>
>
>
>>
>> Any strong reason to avoid it?
>>
>
> yeah, let’s keep the once that are there because the are consistent with
> apple
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141027/40f7b843/attachment-0001.html