[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:30:51PM +0100, Erik Jan de Wit wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> > > 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
> > > since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
> > >
> > > nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure
> > >
> >
> > Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic
> > everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because
> > everything is message payload) can’t we use something like
> > ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or perhaps something that says a
> > little bit more to what this is.
> +1 to userData, clearly communicates intent (if y'all dislike payload) :D
>

how about user-data  ?
(due to consistency ?) :)




>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141027/ba044487/attachment.html