[aerogear-dev] Should Cordova push plugin dependencies be shrinkwrapped?
Erik Jan de Wit
edewit at redhat.com
Fri Sep 5 03:00:53 EDT 2014
Fully agree, problem is these repos don’t have any tag or releases. Maybe we should not use them.
On 4 Sep,2014, at 17:05 , Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have been working cordova push quickstarts and noticed that on Android installation through JBoss tools started to fail.
>
> After a bit of investigation I figured that the failure occurs because push plugin defines cordova plugin "com.google.playservices" as a dependency through a git URL[1] that points to the master of the plugin's repo. Unfortunately this repo received a change [2] which started to use a new feature that was not implemented for JBoss tools. In this particular case, I am already implementing the missing feature so it should be all good soon. However I have doubts that referencing a dependency through master is a good idea. I think it may not only make it really difficult for us to reproduce cases but also unexpected behaviour may just appear.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/google-play-services
> [2] https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/google-play-services/commit/41c19152c21981c9a2f6497cc2100c317f5c660d
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140905/7ca95501/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list