[aerogear-dev] GCM Topics feature branch

[Lukáš Fryč]

+1 let's work on it in a branch

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:

> +9001 I like use branch for WIP
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So it looks like the work for properly supporting topics is going to
>> grow.  So far we have identified two areas for improvement already :
>>  * lfryc and I met this afternoon and discussed how to handle topic
>> failures where calling back to registrationIds is appropriate.  He has some
>> refactors he wants to make.
>>  * Last night on the -users list a community member brought up some use
>> case we have to consider as well.  Specifically around how `alias` and
>> `deviceType` interact with topics.
>>
>> In the spirit of keeping the PRs manageable, I propose we create a
>> feature branches for topics in aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server and
>> aerogear/aerogear-android-push.
>>
>> Barring strong opinions against this, I will create these branches and
>> move my PRs appropriately.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150811/9c6c7abe/attachment.html