[aerogear-dev] UPS console redesign screencast and demo

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hin Andres!
>>>>
>>>> Wow! awesome - I love it! Where can I sign? :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I watched the excelent video and here are a few coments on the new UI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Wizzard*
>>>>
>>>> After "Mobile device: Setup variant", when clicking  "Continue", it
>>>> brings us to the "test push" UI.
>>>>
>>>> Note - for that it is mandatory that the previous step was really
>>>> executed: meaning the app needs to be launched on a (test) device -
>>>> otherwise nothing to send the "test push" to :-)
>>>> Perhaps we should bake that SKIP option a bit into the TEXT - so that
>>>> it is obvious
>>>>
>>> I have discussed that a bit with Andres. What we could do is after the
>>> user has enter the details of the variant (GCM ApiKey / iOS cert), we could
>>> send a dummy message to the vendors network in order to check if these
>>> settings are correct. This would already be a nice check.
>>>
>>
>> well, not much will happen:
>>
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/sender/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/sender/APNsPushNotificationSender.java#L57-L59
>>
> Ah right :) Because there are no installation but beside that
> "implementation issue" , would be nice to have a way to test if the API Key
> etc ... are valid .
>

I agree - we can change it, I think we even have a ticket for that already



>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regarding the device itself, indeed, hard to check/test, but what we
>>> could do is check the DB if an installation has been added. (The developer
>>> registers the device and then click next)
>>>
>>
>> You mean present the "Send dialog" only if there is at least one device
>> already registered? Otherwise, we can again state: now it's time to get a
>> device registered... or something like that - not sure
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Applications overview"
>>>>
>>>> wow -> that looks great :) Glad the navigation bar is gone - you are
>>>> right -> way better. I also like the dashboard location.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "App and its Variants overview"
>>>> -> with no installations: not sure we do always, in that case,
>>>> immediately show the source code. But I can be wrong
>>>> -> with installations: let's integrate pagination. e.g. 10 per page!
>>>> the table looks fantastic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sender API"
>>>> We do have more than Java. also Node.js; I think we could use some sort
>>>> of TAB for the actual platform (similar to the client code)
>>>>
>>>> I do really like the INFO _above_ the code. All info in one place -
>>>> good stuff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Send Notification to App" I like the popup/dialog, including the
>>>> disabled button when there are no devices. Sweet!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Skip Wizzard -> nice, overview with the blank screens
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again, awesome work - I am really looking to get this implemented
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been working on UPS console redesign for the last couple of weeks
>>>>> and I am finally able to share it with you :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a screencast walk through:
>>>>> http://youtu.be/-ab4-F4OCJM
>>>>>
>>>>> And here is the prototype for you to click around:
>>>>> http://andresgalante.com/ups-console/wizard01.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a bunch of details to take care about, specially on step 2
>>>>> of the wizard, we need to make it goes as smooth as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a close look and try to find holes in the interaction. Let
>>>>> me know what you think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150115/8069d3a7/attachment.html