[aerogear-dev] UPS console new UI review

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Thu Jan 22 04:54:23 EST 2015


On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hey!
>
> Today Lukas, Sebastien help me review UPS new UI.
> I also did some usability testing yesterday (over dinner with slightly
> drunk programmers friends of mine).
>
> Here are the results and a bunch of questions for us to discuss:
>
> - Code snippets need a “copy” btn like http://getbootstrap.com/components/


+1


> - Descriptions on apps and variants. Can we just remove them? Are they
> useful?
>

yeah, I think we can remove them. Here is a JIRA for it:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1240


>
> - "Add a variant" form. There is going to be a validation of the form to
> make sure connections are correctly set up.
>

+1 created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1241


>
> - Variants page [1]. If the user has lots of variants set up, the list
> would be huge. I am working on solutions, Lukas and Sebastien had very good
> ideas.
>
> - "Send notification" form has the same problem. Lukas suggested a great
> solution, to use Multiple select boxes
> https://select2.github.io/examples.html


any details?


>
>
> - Warnings. Where to show them? How to display them?


I like how they are presented in the current UI


> How to make them disappear once the issue is solve?
>

Not sure.... we keep them, and after 30 days there is a job to delete the
warnings. I'd keep them, for tracking that there was a problem a few days
ago.


>
> - Delete apps or variants takes a lot of time. there is a JIRA about this.
>

which one ?


>
> - Add a progress bar to show progress of notifications been sent.
>

Isn't that miss leading? We can not guarantee that the message are
delivered to the phone.
We just give them to Google/Apple/etc. If they move them to /dev/null -
well :-)



> - Add links to documentation everywhere.
>

yeah - do we have a JIRA for that ?


>
> - We talked about adding sorting options on the variants list (by name, or
> by creation date) but it seems that search would be enough. although there
> was one tester that asked for sorting options.
>

+1 for search only. Did you guys create a JIRA for that ?


>
> - It also come to my attention that the name “Variant” is too general.
> Every non UPS developer I've shown the console asked me “what are variants”
> and when I explain, they asked me “Why don’t you find a better name that
> represent “group of devices”?
>

It's not just group of devices - it's also per platform. Imagine if there
are paid and free versions of an app. That *can* be managed as two
variants, on one app. I am open to improvements here


>
> Lukas mention that a change of wording at this point would be very hard
> since we have the word “Variant” all over our docs. But maybe for 2.0 we
> can think of a better way to help the user understand what a Variant is.
>

+1 - perhaps we can improve the text on the UI ?


>
> Here is the prototype, click around and send feedback :)
> http://andresgalante.com/ups-console/login.html



I still think the *skip* is too small.

Also, on the wizard, if it should always go to Send (but we had that on a
different thread)


>
>
>
> [1]http://andresgalante.com/ups-console/app-detail-variants.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150122/8be59d59/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list