[aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

[Idel Pivnitskiy]

I heard it from Chromium team, so I think that they are working on client
side for web browser.
Will ask them for more information.

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 
E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>

2015-07-03 13:34 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
> idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not now.
>>
>> Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of
>> current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only
>> milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see
>> this thread [2].
>> Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current
>> draft [3].
>>
>> Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon.
>>
>
> Are they working on the actual wire-protocol? Or are they just on the
> client side, meaning the JS APIs for WebPush?
>
> I think their current focus is using GCM behind the WebPush standard APIs
> (some more context [1]).
>
>
> [1]
> https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/03/push-notificatons-on-the-open-web
>
>
>>
>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-protocol-00.txt
>> [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00183.html
>> [3] https://github.com/unicorn-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>> --
>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com
>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>
>> 2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>:
>>
>>> Hi Idel,
>>>
>>> thanks for sharing!
>>>
>>> Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web
>>> Push draft itself ?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
>>> idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web
>>>> Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of
>>>> encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096
>>>> octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>> --
>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com
>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150703/d24b033c/attachment.html