[aerogear-dev] [RFC] future Roadmap for Unified Push Server

Thu Jul 9 08:17:46 EDT 2015

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that for version 2.x we should deprecate SimplePush, or even
>>> remove it (since ups will soon have initial WebPush support)
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>> I would prefer to mark it as "frozen" (let it go ! Let it go ! ) , not
>> sure that status exist :)
>>
>
> right - our SimplePush server should be finished, and its 1.0.0 should be
> the last release - unless we haz major/security issues.
> Not sure it's up-to-date w/ the latest Moz impl of the server
>
>
>> but what I mean, even if FirefoxOS switch to WebPush, we have here a
>> stable server and client support and maybe there are still valid use cases
>> (iot) where people want to use SPS. So I think it would be nice to keep it
>> (even if we do not update it anymore)
>>
>
> Ok - fair enough - on UPS we can keep the support for SimplePush
>

i second this

>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi team,
>>>>
>>>> as we are moving forward w/ the releases, and we are close to have our
>>>> 1.1.0.Final, I started to think about a proposal for a near-term future
>>>> roadmap, and I'd like to get feedback, comments (or tomatos) on it.
>>>> <https://gist.github.com/matzew/35c3e3b12f78d2ed55f5#ups-11x-julyaugust>UPS
>>>> 1.1.x (July/August)
>>>>
>>>>    - 1.1.0 -> very soon
>>>>    - 1.1.x -> perhaps some needed bug fixes/improvements, in a short
>>>>    interval :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://gist.github.com/matzew/35c3e3b12f78d2ed55f5#ups-120-septemberoctober>UPS
>>>> 1.2.0 (September/October)
>>>>
>>>> We have a release version
>>>> <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12327301> in
>>>> JIRA already.
>>>>
>>>> *Key features*
>>>>
>>>>    - Keycloak isolation
>>>>    - GCM 3 support (client and server)
>>>>    - Improved docker support (e.g. tests/test suite -> Hopefully
>>>>    Travis supports 'docker run' by than ;-))
>>>>
>>>> One could think that going back to JPA annotations is a key feature as
>>>> well ;-)
>>>>
>>>> <https://gist.github.com/matzew/35c3e3b12f78d2ed55f5#ups-12x-or-even-130-december-2015>UPS
>>>> 1.2.x (or even 1.3.0) (December 2015)
>>>>
>>>> There is no concrete release version for this, but we have a larger
>>>> ups-future
>>>> <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12321884> version
>>>> in JIRA. The ups-future version/label has a few interesting things, that we
>>>> may have to do right after 1.2.0
>>>>
>>>> *Key features*
>>>>
>>>>    - APNs goes HTTP2 (a must)
>>>>    - Quiete time for push (aka timezone awareness of devices)
>>>>    - Scheduled pushes
>>>>    - Proxy server support
>>>>
>>>> <https://gist.github.com/matzew/35c3e3b12f78d2ed55f5#ups-200-march-2016>UPS
>>>> 2.0.0 (March-2016)
>>>>
>>>> In October (2015) the WildFly 10
>>>> <http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2015-June/004129.html> should
>>>> be released and I'd like to see us adapting this for the 2.0.0 series! Also
>>>> for a possible release of our 2.0.0 in March 2016, I’d like to stop the 1.x
>>>> series!
>>>>
>>>> *Note:* We don't have a release version for JIRA here, but heck! this
>>>> mail is asking for feedback ;-)
>>>>
>>>> *Key features / Core changes*
>>>>
>>>>    - UPS based on (public) APIs that are available in WildFly-10
>>>>       - looking at using WF feature packs
>>>>       <https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/WildflyProvisioning> (similar
>>>>       to what Keycloak did, e.g. for layered "product"
>>>>       - looking at getting an UPS sub-system
>>>>    - Java8 only (as well as making sure works w/ Java9)
>>>>    - internal communication fully based on messaging (A-MQ / HornetQ)
>>>>    - WildFly-Swarm launcher (aka fat JARs)
>>>>       - helps with a more modular system:
>>>>    - Modular system (e.g. different “webapps”, like "sender.war",
>>>>    "registration.war", "UI WAR" etc)
>>>>       - allows us to play with different platforms for the different
>>>>       “web apps”
>>>>       - e.g. for a 2.x.y we could see/experiment how a vertx
>>>>       microservice (e.g. for the device registration) will behave in the larger
>>>>       system
>>>>
>>>> Other new features, e.g. based on needs and/or requests could be weaved
>>>> into 2.0.0 or 2.0.x, based on timing.
>>>>
>>>> Please review this initial draft of a roadmap - once we are all in
>>>> agreement, it's time to hammer the roadmap into stone, uhm... JIRA :-)
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150709/690a1819/attachment.html 