[aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

[Sebastien Blanc]

I would vote to have them along with the other variant details that are
already shown (like google's project number etc ...)


On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthias and Lukas,
>>
>> During the user research time I've learn that there are almost none use
>> case where the user uses this information stand alone. The user would just
>> copy and paste the code snippet.
>>
>
> well, that does not always work (e.g. sligthly different structure of
> code).
> Even our own Android HelloWorld Demo is not able to use the snippets and
> paste them in (due to different code structure - which is good).
>
> Having them visible give a bit more appreciation to these IDs (or call em
> API keys), so it's easy to get the desired info quickly
>
>
>
>
>>
>> We use it a lot because we test it and set it up a bunch of times UPS. We
>> already have the code set up and we end up knowing where to look for the
>> data. Luke bring this same issue to me during Summit.
>>
>> Let me think of a good way to highlight that information to make the
>> expert user life easier.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>
>>> Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch)
>>> during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.
>>>
>>> @Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?
>>>
>>> I'm all for exposing it more visibly.
>>>
>>> st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> napsal:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to
>>>> notice:
>>>>
>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant.png
>>>>
>>>> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab of
>>>> the Application).
>>>>
>>>> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden,
>>>> since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.
>>>>
>>>> They used to be a bit more present:
>>>>
>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant_details.png
>>>>
>>>> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good
>>>> reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150629/2e27fb37/attachment.html