[aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

[Andres Galante]

Hi!

To solve the variant information I made this:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4371641/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-29%20at%2011.08.30%20AM.png

But we are already showing the sender info at the sender tab:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4371641/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-29%20at%2011.23.10%20AM.png

What do you think?

Andrés



On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Good idea Sebastien! That is a good placement. I'll test it and see if we
> need a line or something to mark a separation between them and the network
> info.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I would vote to have them along with the other variant details that are
>> already shown (like google's project number etc ...)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Matthias and Lukas,
>>>>
>>>> During the user research time I've learn that there are almost none use
>>>> case where the user uses this information stand alone. The user would just
>>>> copy and paste the code snippet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> well, that does not always work (e.g. sligthly different structure of
>>> code).
>>> Even our own Android HelloWorld Demo is not able to use the snippets and
>>> paste them in (due to different code structure - which is good).
>>>
>>> Having them visible give a bit more appreciation to these IDs (or call
>>> em API keys), so it's easy to get the desired info quickly
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We use it a lot because we test it and set it up a bunch of times UPS.
>>>> We already have the code set up and we end up knowing where to look for the
>>>> data. Luke bring this same issue to me during Summit.
>>>>
>>>> Let me think of a good way to highlight that information to make the
>>>> expert user life easier.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch)
>>>>> during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm all for exposing it more visibly.
>>>>>
>>>>> st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>>> matzew at apache.org> napsal:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to
>>>>>> notice:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab
>>>>>> of the Application).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden,
>>>>>> since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They used to be a bit more present:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant_details.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a
>>>>>> good reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -M
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150629/21987a8a/attachment.html