[aerogear-dev] [Android] - Refactoring OAuth2 configuration

[Bruno Oliveira]

On 2015-03-11, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahoy, let me give a more concrete example.
> >
> > This is what I've been working since last week
> > http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/.
> >
>
> The guide is awesome, and I really like it
>
>
> > The credits to the team who worked hard into this documentation will be
> > added on the last section.
> >
>
> IMO, if we add ack to one guide, let's do on other guides as well.
> I think the motivation is here to reflect the amount of work, right?
>
> And yes, writing guides is a lot of work. I wrote the UPS guids, and took
> all the screenshots there (twice), and generated PDFs for product etc.
> I know it's a lot of work, but IMO let's treat all guides the same: each
> gets ack, or none.

The goal is pretty much to give the props for people who wrote the
guide. But I think it's covered by the contributors section
anyways.

>
>
> >
> > So for 3rd parties, we already had something build by the team. What I
> > did was just format and migrate to:
> >
> > http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/#_before_you_get_started
>
>
>
> yeah, it's really cool
>
> >
> >
> > What I have in mind per platform can be seen here:
> >
> > -
> > http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/#_android_3
> > -
> > http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/#_ios_3
>
>
> It's good, especially w/ the different 3rd party service specific code
>
>
> >
> >
> > Not sure if that answers your question, but if something is missing.
> > Feel free to add to AGSEC-200 with a full description. Also keep in mind
> > that I'm working on those sections.
> >
>
> No, I was more asking Summers, since he does not want something like
> let keycloakConfig = KeycloakConfig(...)
>
> in Android - I was wondering if he prefers to just have doc, instead of
> convenience impl, like it exists for iOS/Windows
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 2015-03-10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > That's nice. But I was more asking if we would/should just offer these
> > > guides for 3rd parties like FB/Google instead of having actual code,
> > > meaning some convenience implementations for FB/Google like we do on
> > > iOS/Windows.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914