[aerogear-dev] asciidoc vs markdown
Summers Pittman
supittma at redhat.com
Wed Mar 25 17:03:48 EDT 2015
Andres,
The liquid extensions we us in markdown do allow us to include other
markdown.
Everyone else,
I submitted a PR to enable GItHub style markdown AND enable syntax
highlighting. I say we start moving things to markdown from asciidoc and
forget we ever had two standards. Who volunteers to make the JIRAs and
assign them all to passos while he is on PTO?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com> wrote:
> We are including asciidoc texts into other asciidoc. I don't know if
> markdown supports that.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Summers Pittman" <supittma at redhat.com>
> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 1:01:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] asciidoc vs markdown
>
> On 03/09/2015 11:58 AM, Erik Jan de Wit wrote:
> >>> Having said that, I like markdown better, but again, I am not an user
> :)
> >> I think we were supposed to be migrating TO asciidoc.
> >>
> > Right now we need both, if there was a migration then it was never
> completely finished. So we should either rollback or finish it.
> >
> >> I believe the reasons for asciidoc were 1) We employed the asciidoc guy
> >> and 2) There is/was a requirement to support some doc format that
> >> asciidoc exported to but markdown did not.
> >>
> >> I may be insane though.
> > Seems to me these reasons no longer apply
> If we can confirm that we don't need whatever exports I am thinking of I
> am +1 for moving back to markdown.
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Corinne Krych" <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> >>> To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:36:28 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] asciidoc vs markdown
> >>>
> >>> +1 on having one or the other. I find it confusing to have to switch
> beetween syntax.
> >>> I’m ok with whatever we choose but having only one would be neat.
> >>>
> >>> ++
> >>> Corinne
> >>>> On 09 Mar 2015, at 14:33, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I know we’ve talked about it before (although I’m not sure what was
> decided), but with the new site coming on quite nicely I would like to
> discuss this one more time. Right now we have markdown and asciidoc mixed,
> I think it would be good to choose one or the other. We can convert the
> documents automatically.
> >>>>
> >>>> So what do you think,
> >>>> Erik Jan
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >> --
> >> Summers Pittman
> >>>> Phone:404 941 4698
> >>>> Java is my crack.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
> Summers Pittman
> >>Phone:404 941 4698
> >>Java is my crack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150325/c92f7d7d/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list