[aerogear-dev] Dealing with UPS Keycloak data post-datasource-split

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
wrote:

> Sorry if I'm late for this discussion.
>
> On 2015-05-07, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > How about the following, not optimal, proposal:
> >
> > * get back to one data-source
>
> I'm not against about it, if it's for the benefit of the project.
>
> > * stick w/ Keycloak-1.1.0-final (in case updating to KC-1.2.0 makes above
> > item harder)
>
> I don't get why master must be reverted to 1.1.0 final. I think stable
> release of KC must go in 1.0.x series of UPS, but on master, we must
> stick with the latest greatest release of KC. Because is the only way to
> work closely with KC team.
>

does their DB migration from their 1.0.5.Final to 1.2.0.CR1 work?
If yes -> alright, let's go w/ KC 1.2..CR - if not, well it's not the end
of the world to go back :-)


Or, we just do NOT support any KC db migration, just ours - that's fine w/
me...


>
> >
> > I understand that a separation of the two is needed on the longer run -
> it
> > would be good if that's something on our agenda post 1.1.0 e.g. for 1.2.0
> >
> > I think the above is a 'work around', which I could live with and buys us
> > time to truly think about a perfect separation.
>
> My 2 cents here and my humble opinion is the fact that we don't need
> perfection,
> only the correct. Today, split Keycloak and UPS would the most
> correct thing to do. I'm not saying what we're doing here is dead wrong,
> but
> sooner or later the problem will hit us anyway.
>
> So maybe we should attack the problem now?
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Howdy y'all!
> > >>
> > >> I'm revisiting migration strategies for UPS master, and we have a
> tough
> > >> situation to deal with.
> > >>
> > >> Since we have moved keycloak to its own DataSource, there are KC
> > >> leftovers at UPS database which need to be cleaned up.
> > >>
> > >> 1) Any suggestions on how to provide a migration path?
> > >>   Since the tables are intertwined with UPS tables, it's not a matter
> of
> > >> doing a db dump/restore...
> > >>
> > >
> > > how are they intertwined? Is UPS stuff stored in KC tables, or vice
> versa?
> > >
> > >
> > >> 2) How to ensure we can safely get rid of the leftover tables on UPS
> > >> DataSource?
> > >>   I can easily provide migrations which just nuke the tables from the
> > >> face of the earth,
> > >>
> > >
> > > that's good, but
> > >
> > >
> > >> but how to do this without data loss?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I don't know :-) I wonder if we just can not move the data to a new
> > > datasource.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150512/37395f9f/attachment.html