[aerogear-dev] verification of JMS workflow

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Wed Nov 18 06:39:18 EST 2015


+1

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:

> There is an issue covering that:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1420
>
> Should we schedule it for 1.1.1?
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Lukas, Tomas,
>>
>> good input, on the different settings - can you of you send a PR against
>> our aerogear.org repo, so that we have this documented in our user guide
>> for configuration?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've discussed this further with Tomas and he told me he successfully
>>> tested that our impl does not exceed given (configured) memory limits.
>>>
>>> You have to switch the queue settings to: address-full-policy=BLOCK
>>> (default is PAGE, which can cause exceeding the disk space and perhaps slow
>>> down the node if there are really lot of recipients. which is, well, not
>>> ideal) :-).
>>> The best option would be to use address-full-policy=FAIL. I believe this
>>> will fail transaction and the queue will try to redeliver, but still have
>>> to get to confirming that. (This can be configured to exponential back-off
>>> and try to deliver so many times that it really does its job (such as try
>>> to redeliver after 5 seconds, but repeat that e.g. up to 2 hours, then fail
>>> the message finally as non-deliverable)).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Fryc <lfryc at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've updated the related issue to track the idea:
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1521
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> awesome, great to hear -
>>>>>
>>>>> For the 1.1.x (mainly 1.1.1 first ;-)) let's see if we can provide an
>>>>> optimized strategy. Lukas was already hinting this on IRC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tomas, thanks for the updates and the testing effort!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tomáš Hradec <thradec at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did some testing of JMS workflow used in UPS during sending
>>>>>> notifications. I can confirm, that suggested blocking strategy, as
>>>>>> protection against OOM errors, works as expected. However in worst scenario
>>>>>> could cause blocking 6 of 20 threads (from MDBs pool). So I would suggest
>>>>>> using different approach, with more optimal resource usage, some options
>>>>>> were discussed already with Lukas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Tomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lukáš Fryč
>>>> Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lukáš Fryč
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lukáš Fryč
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat Mobile | AeroGear.org, FeedHenry.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20151118/ef16548a/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list