[aerogear-dev] SimplePush Polyfill work

[Luke Holmquist]

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:59 PM, JR Conlin <jrconlin at gmail.com> wrote:

> +4
>
> (sorry, just had some fun with a bounding issue, and felt like sharing.)
>
> Just to let y'all know, we're going to be running SimplePush for a while,
> mostly for older devices. One thing we discovered is that some clients may
> have a LARGE number of old channels registered and sending them as part of
> the Hello is a waste. (Our server doesn't pay attention to them.) Newer
> clients may have an interim fix that blanks the clientIDs:[] record.) Aside
> from that, we're definitely not going to be pushing any changes that should
> impact your library.
>
> We've not stood up a production WebPush server, partly because the data
> encryption portion of the standard is still under discussion. For what it's
> worth, there are also a few other discussion points that have yet to be
> finalized (e.g. should developers register with servers, should clients
> specify channels like they did for SimplePush, etc.) but the data bit is
> the biggest obstacle.
>

i see that PushAPI is enabled in FF42,  and i've successfully gotten
notifications with a test i did,  what kind of server are you using then?
 i noticed that in the"dom.push.serverURL" is wss://
push.services.mozilla.com/


>
> As always, thanks so much for the continuing support.
>
>
> On 8/31/2015 12:45 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy at gmail.com
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Daniel Bevenius <
> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> måndag 31 augusti 2015 skrev Sebastien Blanc < <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> scm.blanc at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> so now that WebPush is going to take over SimplePush, i'm thinking of
>>>> closing the related JIRA's that we have open for simple push in the AG-JS
>>>> instance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not that we've really done any work on it lately,  but it would be good
>>>> to clean this up a little.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Luke
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150901/e1d6505b/attachment.html