[aerogear-dev] Web Push protocol WGLC

Daniel Bevenius daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 00:03:11 EDT 2016


> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion
will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they
merged a few changes this week [4].
I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare time to
do this at the moment).



On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback as
> soon as possible.
>
> I've initiated a few thread:
>
>    1.
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549
>    2.
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559
>
> Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the draft
> for me.
>
> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion will
> be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they merged
> a few changes this week [4].
>
> [1]
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524
> [2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05
> [4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160607/ee827720/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list