[aerogear-dev] Web Push protocol WGLC

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Hi Idel,

thanks a lot, this is good feedback on the status!

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Community provides a good feedback and a lot of changes were merged. WG
> decided to postpone WGLC for a 2 weeks to resolve all issues.
>
> New discussion threads were initiated by me:
>
>    1. Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00578
>    2. Different status codes for negative Push Message Receipts:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00579
>    3. When UA should send an acknowledgement?
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00580
>    4. 414 Request-URL Too Long:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00581
>    5. Try to deliver receipt at least once, even if TTL expired:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00582
>    6. Delivery receipt may be sent before AS request delivery:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00597
>
> For some of them new GitHub issues was created. Also here is one issue
> without sending messages to the Web Push mailing list:
>
> Prefer: wait=0 for Receiving Push Message Receipts:
> https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/113
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> > Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion
>> will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they
>> merged a few changes this week [4].
>> I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare time
>> to do this at the moment).
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback as
>>> soon as possible.
>>>
>>> I've initiated a few thread:
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549
>>>    2.
>>>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559
>>>
>>> Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the
>>> draft for me.
>>>
>>> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion
>>> will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they
>>> merged a few changes this week [4].
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524
>>> [2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
>>> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05
>>> [4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>> --
>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160609/e438177d/attachment.html