[aerogear-dev] Chrome Push API with AeroGear Unified Push Example
Luke Holmquist
lholmqui at redhat.com
Tue Jun 28 08:43:10 EDT 2016
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thank you, guys!
>
>
>> i remember writing a blog post on using the Android variant for chrome,
>> but i don't think i ever created an example for it. And i think it was
>> only for packaged apps at that time.
>>
>
> Yes, previously it worked just with chrome extensions and applications.
>
>
>> I've actually been looking at Web Push a little lately and i noticed that
>> to send a payload, there are some extra bits of info, that are attached to
>> the subscription object that would probably need to be stored on the UPS
>> somehow. I believe this is the same for FF too.
>
>
> Chrome does not support payload in push notifications because they haven't
> implemented encryption yet. Encryption of push messages is mandatory.
> That's why they decided to keep it null. But according to the MDN, FF
> should support it [1]. I will check.
>
check out the Service Workers Cookbook, for the Push With Payload example,
https://serviceworke.rs/push-payload.html . It works in Firefox
>
> I also want to notice, that FCM/GCM does not support Web Push protocol
> now. Googlers just implemented a Push API [2] in Chrome (browser part of
> WebPush) and use their proprietary protocol for push message delivering.
>
> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/ru/docs/Web/API/PushEvent
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/push-api/
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Awesome.
>>
>> i remember writing a blog post on using the Android variant for chrome,
>> but i don't think i ever created an example for it. And i think it was
>> only for packaged apps at that time. So this is really nice.
>>
>>
>> I've actually been looking at Web Push a little lately and i noticed that
>> to send a payload, there are some extra bits of info, that are attached to
>> the subscription object that would probably need to be stored on the UPS
>> somehow. I believe this is the same for FF too.
>>
>> I wonder if we should start looking at a "WebPush" variant. If only
>> Safari would follow suit.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Oleg Matskiv <omatskiv at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Idel,
>>> Great demo !
>>>
>>> Thank you for sharing.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
>>> idel.pivnitskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've created an example, which shows how Chrome Push API could work
>>>> with AeroGear Unified Push. It works without any changes to the UPS code
>>>> base!
>>>>
>>>> Here is a sample app:
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js-cookbook/pull/13
>>>> And here is a demo: https://youtu.be/o6FdbJm-47Y
>>>>
>>>> Hope you will enjoy! :)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>> --
>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oleg Matskiv
>>> Associate Quality Engineer
>>> Red Hat Mobile Application Platform
>>> omatskiv at redhat.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160628/15aa9cd5/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list