[aerogear-dev] WildFly 11

[Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo]

Does make sense to update Keycloak so it doesn't fail? It seems to be a
dependency issue.

On 16 June 2017 at 13:16, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> just tested alpha1, but our legacy keycloak is biting us:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-2117
>
> -M
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while WF 11.0 is not yet release, I'd like to see us getting on to WF 11
>> on the master branch
>>
>> http://wildfly.org/downloads/
>>
>> I think that our master branch should be exclusively target the latest
>> from WF stable, which is 11 in the future. So getting to know what's
>> problematic w/ the WF 11-alpha series is a good thing.
>>
>> Comments ?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat

<https://www.redhat.com/>

M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20170619/76b6c222/attachment.html