[aerogear-dev] Make MobileCore Init automatically called in Android SDK

Wei Li weil at redhat.com
Tue Apr 3 06:04:18 EDT 2018


Yes, that's why I am wondering if there is any negative side-effects of
doing it this way. Given that this is really a hack, is it possible that
Google may forbid this kind of usage in the future?

Given how easy it is to initialise the SDK at the moment (one line of code
<https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android-sdk/blob/master/example/src/main/java/org/aerogear/mobile/example/ExampleApplication.java#L18>),
I do have to question if there is enough value in doing this work?

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:

> @Wei I think @Daniel point is that this is a trick/workaround. We wouldn't
> use this content provider to share anything but to call MobileCore.init
> only.
>
> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>
> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> On 3 April 2018 at 11:16, Wei Li <weil at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> By reading the document, it looks like "ContentProvider" is meant to
>> provide some data for other applications. If we use it for initialising the
>> SDK, what data will be provided to other apps? Is there any other negative
>> side effects of using this approach?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Wojciech Trocki <wtrocki at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great idea!
>>> This will allow SDK to be flexible, developer friendly and more aligned
>>> with typical Android patterns.
>>>
>>> > I don't think removing manual initialisation is too important
>>>
>>> It will be just side effect after we move to use Android standards like `Content
>>> provider` etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:57 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>>> jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think removing manual initialisation is too important, I'd
>>>> expect that from any other library. However auto-magic is way more elegant
>>>> and user friendly, so +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> TL;DR what Firebase does is uses a Content Provide[1] (not really
>>>>> created for this) as a trick to initialize the lib before the app starts
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you provide some reference for this?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>>>>
>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>
>>>> M: +34618488633
>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>
>>>> On 29 March 2018 at 23:30, Daniel Passos <dpassos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Revisiting some Google and Firebase stuff Summers and I realized the
>>>>> Firebase Android SDK doesn’t need we do any init to the lib starts/be
>>>>> configured.
>>>>>
>>>>> TL;DR what Firebase does is uses a Content Provide[1] (not really
>>>>> created for this) as a trick to initialize the lib before the app starts
>>>>>
>>>>> Why Content provider?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because it has access to the applicationContext[2] and is called
>>>>> *before* all other Android kinds of stuff in the Android lifecycle
>>>>> (including Application)
>>>>>
>>>>> I’d like to do the same for our Android SDK and initialize the lib
>>>>> using the same trick so we can provide a MobileCore.getInstance()
>>>>> already configured with all the things the developer needs (Logger,
>>>>> HttpLayer, Mobile Services info, etc…) without need to create an
>>>>> application class or call MobileCore.init(context) anywhere and kill
>>>>> all static methods we have today in MobileCore
>>>>>
>>>>> It will also allow us to send the default metrics before the Android
>>>>> lifecycle starts the app and have some controls (when need) to know when
>>>>> the app is in background and foreground, listeners possible crashes and
>>>>> other things without the developer needs to call/configure anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: This is will probably be the first step to kill the responsibility
>>>>> to the MobileCore instantiate the Service Modules[3]
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/providers/content
>>>>> -providers.html
>>>>> [2] https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Cont
>>>>> entProvider.html#getContext()
>>>>> [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID-796
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> -- Passos
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Aerogear" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to aerogear+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to aerogear at googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CADF%3Dh2vUzwb1U3
>>>>> 0O0GB9J4taBkkvAuvUdSkqHEk7jyQfDhK3Og%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CADF%3Dh2vUzwb1U30O0GB9J4taBkkvAuvUdSkqHEk7jyQfDhK3Og%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Aerogear" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to aerogear+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to aerogear at googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>>>> gid/aerogear/CAGsbZmGiRzbG_b5Tp3i-rCYCUNLrms%2BwGd1c_eq2UXyv
>>>> ekGvEw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CAGsbZmGiRzbG_b5Tp3i-rCYCUNLrms%2BwGd1c_eq2UXyvekGvEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> WOJCIECH TROCKI
>>>
>>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> IM: wtrocki
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> WEI LI
>>
>> Principal SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>>
>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> weil at redhat.com    M: +353862393272
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>
>


-- 

WEI LI

Principal SOFTWARE ENGINEER

Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>

weil at redhat.com    M: +353862393272
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180403/ae454129/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list