[aerogear-dev] Mitigating ML problems

[Craig Brookes]

Have no strong opinions on this whatever works is ok with me

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 4:35 PM, John Frizelle <jfrizell at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Until such time as we get confirmation that the problems with delivery to
> the arergrear-dev ML have been fixed (or we migrate from mailman to a
> public google group for the ML), can I ask that ALL mail sent to the
> aerogear-dev ML is also sent to the other 2 MLs on this thread -
> feedhenry-dev and mobile-dev.
>
> I know this is a bit of a pain, but it's even more painful to not have
> mails delivered in a timely fashion.
>
> I know there has been suggestions made to move from mailman to Google
> Groups already, but not sure where these discussions are at... Is there
> anything preventing us making this jump - the mailman ML problem has been
> ongoing for quite some time now with no resolution in sight that I am aware
> of, so perhaps it's time to look at moving to Google Groups?
>
> Cheers,
> John.
>
> --
> John Frizelle
> Chief Architect, Red Hat Mobile
> Consulting Engineer
>
> mobile: *+353 87 290 1644 <//+353872901644>*
> twitter:* @johnfriz*
> skype: *john_frizelle*
> mail: *jfrizell at redhat.com <jfrizell at redhat.com>*
>
>
>
>


-- 
Craig Brookes
RHMAP
@maleck13 Github
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180110/c0a1c5e5/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11472 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180110/c0a1c5e5/attachment.png