[aerogear-dev] [feedhenry-dev] Naming Convention for Mobile Services ?

[Massimiliano Ziccardi]

Agree with Wei for `auth` instead of `keycloak` or `security`

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Wei Li <weil at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1. I prefer `auth` as `security` is too vague.
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:28 PM, John Frizelle <jfrizell at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Agree that "Security & Identity Management" should not be "keycloak"
>>
>> Suggest we use "auth" or "security" instead.
>>
>> @Joe - I would hope that we could come up with names that work both
>> upstream and downstream. Which ones would you have questions/concerns about?
>>
>> --
>> John Frizelle
>> Chief Architect, Red Hat Mobile
>> Consulting Engineer
>>
>> mobile: *+353 87 290 1644 <//+353872901644>*
>> twitter:* @johnfriz*
>> skype: *john_frizelle*
>> mail: *jfrizell at redhat.com <jfrizell at redhat.com>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 January 2018 at 09:35, Paul Wright <pwright at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> thanks for starting this discussion, can I object to one item:
>>>
>>> Security & Identity Management = keycloak
>>>
>>> because this is likely to end up in downstream documentation, we should
>>> avoid names of upstream projects. In this case I hope we can use something
>>> like 'identity' instead?
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On 01/10/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Foley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I had a brief discussion with John around Naming Conventions and what
>>> may be worth putting in place which could be beneficial but not
>>> restrictive. I wanted to kick start discussion on this around what may be
>>> worthwhile.
>>>
>>> An important aspect of 5.x is the value add services and getting these
>>> in place and discoverable from Mobile Core. Should we be applying some
>>> naming convention or mandatory attributes to these services?
>>>
>>> Attributes / Properties of a Service, e.g. ;
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> *Display Name*: Push Notifications
>>> *id / serviceName*: push
>>> *APB Label/Tag*: mobile-service
>>> Would it be any benefit if the APB tag (mobile-service) carried over and
>>> became a label on the OCP service (e.g. for the Core SDK to read what
>>> Mobile Services are available in a namespace)?
>>> *APB Integrations*: <list of service ids of the services this service
>>> integrates with>
>>>
>>> Some of the above may be agreed already!
>>>
>>> We should agree on the actual serviceNames (interested to hear the
>>> Mobile Service Teams view on what the names should be):
>>> Metrics = metrics
>>> Push Notifications = push
>>> Data Synchronisation = sync
>>> Security & Identity Management = keycloak
>>> Mobile Build Automation = build
>>> API Gateway = gateway
>>>
>>> Are there other naming aspects which could be worthwhile getting
>>> agreement on? Around the SDKs, as they are being designed now, it is
>>> probably worth considering also.
>>>
>>> All opinions welcome.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Chris.
>>> --
>>>
>>> CHRISTOPHER FOLEY
>>>
>>> BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST, MOBILE
>>>
>>> Red Hat Ireland <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>
>>> Communications House, Cork Road,
>>>
>>> Waterford City, Ireland X91NY33
>>>
>>> chfoley at redhat.com
>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> feedhenry-dev mailing listfeedhenry-dev at redhat.comhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Wright
>>> Mobile Docs (github: finp)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> feedhenry-dev mailing list
>>> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> feedhenry-dev mailing list
>> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> WEI LI
>
> SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>
> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> weil at redhat.com    M: +353862393272
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180112/d98f1e77/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11472 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180112/d98f1e77/attachment-0001.png