[aerogear-dev] [feedhenry-dev] Proposal for addition of --mobile flag to oc cluster up

Fri Jan 12 07:06:39 EST 2018

I'd actually prefer more --mobile - which than does exactly what we need

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Phil Brookes <pbrookes at redhat.com> wrote:

> I’ve discussed this privately with Wojciech as I had misunderstood his
> suggestion, so here’s my attempt to clarify the discussion:
>
> Rather than inserting our mobile oriented tasks into the upstream tool
> (oc), which doesn’t provide value to all users of that tool but rather only
> to the users who are interested in the mobile use-case; we should instead
> modify the tool so that it can accept addons, similar (ideally, identical)
> to minishift addons.
>
> The proposal here would be something like:
>
> oc cluster addons install mobilecore
> oc cluster addons enable mobilecore
> oc cluster up
>
> There a few benefits to this solution:
>
>    - There is a clear value-add to the upstream tool
>    - We only need to maintain one mobilecore plugin for both minishift
>    and oc cluster up
>    - The barrier to entry for mobile developers is low
>    - The process for setting up a local cluster is the same with both
>    tools
>    - Future changes to the setup process of the Mobile-Core can be
>    submitted to our own repo
>
> @Wojciech please correct me, if I’ve still misunderstood anything!
>
> Regards,
> Phil.
> 
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:46 AM, David Martin <davmarti at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there's great value in --mobile flag.
>>> Its the same approach for metrics and logging (--metrics, --logging)
>>>
>>> It would do everything needed to enable the mobile extension and get the
>>> cluster into the state we want.
>>> Having to provide multiple flags would make it just that little more
>>> complex that it raises the barrier.
>>>
>>> I do think there's upstream value in allowing configuring a default org
>>> for the broker though, but I don't think it should be part of this proposal.
>>>
>>> On 12 January 2018 at 11:39, Phil Brookes <pbrookes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Wojciech,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the feedback.
>>>>
>>>> If I have understood you correctly, you are suggesting splitting this
>>>> task in to two discrete pieces of work:
>>>>
>>>>    - Add parameters to oc cluster up, to be able to configure the
>>>>    ansible-service-broker with custom docker credentials and docker org to
>>>>    pull in the ASBs from.
>>>>    - Add the —mobile flag to enable the Mobile-Core UI extension.
>>>>
>>>> With the intention of making this an easier change to adopt.
>>>>
>>>> If that is correct then I am happy to proceed this way and I can update
>>>> the proposal to reflect this as a route to implementation.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it would be best to bring this discussion to the proposal so that
>>>> the OpenShift team also have access to it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Phil.
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Wojciech Trocki <wtrocki at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mobile flag as it doesn't provide ability to change values and imposes
>>>>> some hard dependencies.
>>>>> That may be hard accept and maintain on upstream.
>>>>> Upstream works by generalization so if we want to contribute there
>>>>> it's best to pass something that can be used by many people.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about `oc cluster up --service-broker=true
>>>>> --service-broker-org=aerogearcatalog` and whatever else we need?
>>>>> That's easier to accept and contribute upstream.
>>>>> I have done changes for cluster up recently so if you need anything in
>>>>> that let me know - we can work on this together.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another idea is to specify oc cluster up pre/post actions (hooks) that
>>>>> will allow people to run ansible roles for things we need.
>>>>> That will be solid proposal that upstream may consider.
>>>>>
>>>>> Developers can still have simple command by doing alias:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *alias oc-mobile-up=`oc cluster up --service-broker=true
>>>>> --service-broker-org=aerogearcatalog` *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:51 AM, David Ffrench <dffrench at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Fantastic Phil, This is 100% needed in my opinion. The mobile
>>>>>> services need to be a first class citizen in OpenShift to ensure easy setup
>>>>>> and adoption.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DAVID FFRENCH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> senior software engineer, RED HAT MOBILE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Red Hat Waterford <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Communications House, Cork Road
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Waterford, Ireland
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dffrench at redhat.com
>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>>>> mwessend at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +9001
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Phil Brookes <pbrookes at redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have opened a proposal with the OpenShift team, hoping to start a
>>>>>>>> discussion around the addition of a --mobile=true flag to the oc
>>>>>>>> cluster up command. Running oc cluster up --mobile=true will start
>>>>>>>> a local OpenShift cluster with all of the MCP features enabled.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This would be a great way for us to gain some exposure for the
>>>>>>>> Mobile Core and get it into the hands of developers more quickly and
>>>>>>>> easily, so I’d love to see you share your thoughts on this idea. You can
>>>>>>>> review / comment / support it here:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/18089
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Project lead AeroGear.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> feedhenry-dev mailing list
>>>>>> feedhenry-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> WOJCIECH TROCKI
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>> IM: wtrocki
>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Martin
>>> Red Hat Mobile
>>> Twitter: @irldavem
>>> IRC: @irldavem (#aerogear)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Craig Brookes
>> RHMAP
>> @maleck13 Github
>>
>
>

-- 
Project lead AeroGear.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180112/a6f7705f/attachment-0001.html 