[aerogear-dev] MCP Catalog Items version

[Matthias Wessendorf]

done

I generally find it also nasty that, if you build an _existing_ apb locally
and directly push it, that it shows up twice.

sure one comes from the dh org that is configured (e.g. aerogearcatalog),
and the one that's new comes from the local registry, pretty hard to
determine which is what :)

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:

> Filed the issue here: https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog/
> issues/624
>
> Upvote and comment please!
>
> PS: I removed mobile-dev from te CC list
>
> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>
> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> On 24 January 2018 at 14:01, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes I think that is a good idea. More so stating what you want and why
>>> and then they will reply to it and it will go from there
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>>> jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Craig shall I file an issue there asking for that change?
>>>>
>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>>>>
>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>
>>>> M: +34618488633
>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>
>>>> On 24 January 2018 at 12:18, Craig Brookes <cbrookes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> version information would very useful I agree. It is likely something
>>>>> we could define in the metadata for the apb.yaml but to display it, rather
>>>>> than the asb team, I think we would want to add an issue to the
>>>>> https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Peter Braun <pbraun at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker team.
>>>>>> A workaround could be to add the version to the description in apb.yml (
>>>>>> https://github.com/aerogearcatalog/keycloak-apb/blob/master
>>>>>> /apb.yml#L3).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>>>>>> jgallaso at redhat.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs
>>>>>> from the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I
>>>>>> don't have the APB I expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>>>>>> Red Hat
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> M: +34618488633
>>>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Craig Brookes
>>>>> RHMAP
>>>>> @maleck13 Github
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Craig Brookes
>>> RHMAP
>>> @maleck13 Github
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> github: https://github.com/matzew
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

github: https://github.com/matzew
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20180124/d621d37c/attachment-0001.html