From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 10 10:27:42 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:27:42 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version on
	OpenShift
Message-ID: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>

Hello,

I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with it. Thanks guys!

Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).

The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my first time on OpenShift, sorry).

Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the server?

Thanks,
Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/65c4005f/attachment.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 10 10:40:14 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:40:14 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
 on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Thomas,

glad you like the UPS. Regarding your question, can you login to Openshift
and simply restart the instance? That should do the trick

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with
> it. Thanks guys!
>
> Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN
> servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the
> latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).
>
> The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature
> available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my
> first time on OpenShift, sorry).
>
> Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the
> server?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/d1f2140f/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 10 10:54:51 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:54:51 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
	on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>

Hey Matthias,

thanks for the quick reply.

I restarted the openshift application, but the cartridge version still shows ?1.0.0?, and the problem with the SSLHandShakeExpection still persists.

Any idea?

Thanks again,
Thomas



On 10.11.2014, at 16:40, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
> 
> glad you like the UPS. Regarding your question, can you login to Openshift and simply restart the instance? That should do the trick
> 
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with it. Thanks guys!
> 
> Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).
> 
> The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my first time on OpenShift, sorry).
> 
> Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the server?
> 
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/76f4e2d4/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/76f4e2d4/attachment-0001.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 10 11:07:31 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:07:31 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
 on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Hey Matthias,
>
> thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I restarted the openshift application, but the cartridge version still
> shows ?1.0.0?,
>

that is expected :)


> and the problem with the SSLHandShakeExpection still persists.
>

on a new send ?


>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks again,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> On 10.11.2014, at 16:40, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> glad you like the UPS. Regarding your question, can you login to Openshift
> and simply restart the instance? That should do the trick
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with
>> it. Thanks guys!
>>
>> Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN
>> servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the
>> latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).
>>
>> The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature
>> available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my
>> first time on OpenShift, sorry).
>>
>> Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the
>> server?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/7ecea5e0/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 10 12:08:05 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:08:05 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
	on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <66833AF3-31F4-4DB6-B608-BA330DE1B45E@me.com>

Sorry, the warning of the previous (failed) send was still there - the new send actually was delivered successfully.

What I notice is that the number of receivers is wrong (it seems to be n^2 (16) instead of n (4)) - here is the ?notification? activity/details:

??????

Dashboard  AppName
Notification	Receivers	Status	Timestamp
 {"ipAddress":?91.115.xxx.yyy","clientIdentifier":"Ae...	16 installations	Succeeded	10 Nov, 18:01:44, 2014
Request IP:	91.115.xxx.yyy	Full Request
Message:	{ "message" : "Test notification - please ignore!" }
Variants:	
iOS Dev	Succeeded	4 installations
iOS Dev	Succeeded	4 installations
iOS Dev	Succeeded	4 installations
iOS Dev	Succeeded	4 installations

??????

When I look at the number of installations on the applications page, the correct number (4 in the example) is shown.

It seems the notification is only sent once per installation - but before I send a notification to 50k users, I better make sure. Can you confirm that this is just a frontend issue in the dashboard?

Cheers,
Thomas



On 10.11.2014, at 17:07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> Hey Matthias,
> 
> thanks for the quick reply.
> 
> I restarted the openshift application, but the cartridge version still shows ?1.0.0?,
> 
> that is expected :) 
>  
> and the problem with the SSLHandShakeExpection still persists.
> 
> on a new send ? 
>  
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Thanks again,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> On 10.11.2014, at 16:40, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Thomas,
>> 
>> glad you like the UPS. Regarding your question, can you login to Openshift and simply restart the instance? That should do the trick
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with it. Thanks guys!
>> 
>> Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).
>> 
>> The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my first time on OpenShift, sorry).
>> 
>> Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the server?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/c787d29c/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/c787d29c/attachment.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 10 12:20:27 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:20:27 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
 on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <66833AF3-31F4-4DB6-B608-BA330DE1B45E@me.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>
	<66833AF3-31F4-4DB6-B608-BA330DE1B45E@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2QfZdy1WWOmRtp596wqUnL54COWa_s9XU7aO1NcV6_VUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Sorry, the warning of the previous (failed) send was still there - the new
> send actually was delivered successfully.
>

yeah, it keeps a history :)



>
> What I notice is that the number of receivers is wrong (it seems to be n^2
> (16) instead of n (4)) - here is the ?notification? activity/details:
>
> ??????
>
> Dashboard  AppName
> Notification Receivers Status Timestamp
>  {"ipAddress":?91.115.xxx.yyy","clientIdentifier":"Ae... 16 installations
> Succeeded 10 Nov, 18:01:44, 2014
> Request IP: 91.115.xxx.yyy Full Request
> Message: { "message" : "Test notification - please ignore!" }
> Variants:
> iOS Dev Succeeded 4 installations
> iOS Dev Succeeded 4 installations
> iOS Dev Succeeded 4 installations
> iOS Dev Succeeded 4 installations
>
> ??????
>
> When I look at the number of installations on the applications page, the
> correct number (4 in the example) is shown.
>

oh, I think some foo is going on, when doing a retry. Can you file a JIRA
ticket for us ?



>
> It seems the notification is only sent once per installation - but before
> I send a notification to 50k users, I better make sure. Can you confirm
> that this is just a frontend issue in the dashboard?
>

sounds like our stats are making up some numbers :)


>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> On 10.11.2014, at 17:07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Matthias,
>>
>> thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>> I restarted the openshift application, but the cartridge version still
>> shows ?1.0.0?,
>>
>
> that is expected :)
>
>
>> and the problem with the SSLHandShakeExpection still persists.
>>
>
> on a new send ?
>
>
>>
>> Any idea?
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10.11.2014, at 16:40, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> glad you like the UPS. Regarding your question, can you login to
>> Openshift and simply restart the instance? That should do the trick
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I?ve been using Aerogear Push 1.0.0 on OpenShift and am very happy with
>>> it. Thanks guys!
>>>
>>> Now, I?m getting SSLHandshakeExceptions when I try to connect to APN
>>> servers. I read that Apple removed SSLv3, so I want to upgrade to the
>>> latest 1.0.2 version (which I understand fixes this).
>>>
>>> The question is - how? Is there an automatic ?upgrade cartridge? feature
>>> available in OpenShift? (Although I do have experience on AWS, this is my
>>> first time on OpenShift, sorry).
>>>
>>> Or do I have to manually upload the latest WAR files, and restart the
>>> server?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/cf917e74/attachment-0001.html 

From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 10 12:46:36 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:46:36 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
	on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2QfZdy1WWOmRtp596wqUnL54COWa_s9XU7aO1NcV6_VUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>
	<66833AF3-31F4-4DB6-B608-BA330DE1B45E@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QfZdy1WWOmRtp596wqUnL54COWa_s9XU7aO1NcV6_VUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <94B1DBC8-58A5-4353-A0EC-E6AE97D395B1@me.com>

On 10.11.2014, at 18:20, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> When I look at the number of installations on the applications page, the correct number (4 in the example) is shown.
> 
> oh, I think some foo is going on, when doing a retry. Can you file a JIRA ticket for us ? 

?> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1103

i don?t think it?s related to a retry though, as it also happens with a brand new notification message, on a different app .

thanks for the quick help!

Cheers,
Thomas



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/d2ac1453/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/d2ac1453/attachment.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 10 12:58:13 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:58:13 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] How to upgrade Aerogear Push to latest version
 on OpenShift
In-Reply-To: <94B1DBC8-58A5-4353-A0EC-E6AE97D395B1@me.com>
References: <CD6A71FD-FF4D-442E-9D5B-3E6A703A76BF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2THT0vi_+U27s0k8KfokkMvzcqUHrkYfi5JaGui6DCXXA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6651DBFA-1204-4C2E-B686-942C0C8027EF@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QxHYPmeeKBAD_x6ECrB4T_dQve+qzhGW1gB+gTbL910g@mail.gmail.com>
	<66833AF3-31F4-4DB6-B608-BA330DE1B45E@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2QfZdy1WWOmRtp596wqUnL54COWa_s9XU7aO1NcV6_VUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<94B1DBC8-58A5-4353-A0EC-E6AE97D395B1@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2SttHpQjmYqzKM0iZ5GBET=Gq8rjd4A7pW6y1mN2goBhA@mail.gmail.com>

yeah, it's perhaps some storing, somehow incorrect numbers. not nice, but
not a deal breaker :)

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> On 10.11.2014, at 18:20, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> When I look at the number of installations on the applications page, the
>> correct number (4 in the example) is shown.
>>
>
> oh, I think some foo is going on, when doing a retry. Can you file a JIRA
> ticket for us ?
>
>
> ?> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1103
>
> i don?t think it?s related to a retry though, as it also happens with a
> brand new notification message, on a different app .
>
> thanks for the quick help!
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141110/74af617a/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 11 03:34:01 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:34:01 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Devoxx OAuth2
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for native
apps.

Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0

Enjoy!
-Matthias

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/b01dfba2/attachment.html 

From theute at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 06:19:38 2014
From: theute at redhat.com (Thomas Heute)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:19:38 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] Devoxx OAuth2
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5461F0CA.9030502@redhat.com>

http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#16 
is just awesome  :)

Thomas


On 11/11/2014 09:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for 
> native apps.
>
> Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
> http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0
>
> Enjoy!
> -Matthias
>
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/ad45d8bf/attachment.html 

From bsutter at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 09:14:48 2014
From: bsutter at redhat.com (Burr Sutter)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:14:48 -0500
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] Devoxx OAuth2
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C02CEA6D-EBA4-4139-B844-D2D7D9940A47@redhat.com>

Wow - these are awesome slides!


> On Nov 11, 2014, at 3:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for native apps.
> 
> Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
> http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0 <http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0>
> 
> Enjoy!
> -Matthias
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ <http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>_______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/90e902a5/attachment.html 

From jbalunas at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 10:01:51 2014
From: jbalunas at redhat.com (Jay Balunas)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:01:51 -0500
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] Devoxx OAuth2
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <38E0AAE6-A25D-4FED-98EE-FA23943AF430@redhat.com>

Great stuff Corinne!!

On Nov 11, 2014, at 3:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for native apps.
> 
> Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
> http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0
> 
> Enjoy!
> -Matthias
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/d77d46e5/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/d77d46e5/attachment-0001.bin 

From daniel.bevenius at gmail.com  Tue Nov 11 10:23:57 2014
From: daniel.bevenius at gmail.com (Daniel Bevenius)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] Devoxx OAuth2
In-Reply-To: <38E0AAE6-A25D-4FED-98EE-FA23943AF430@redhat.com>
References: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
	<38E0AAE6-A25D-4FED-98EE-FA23943AF430@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAFJm-3FfdGtTqwn8MHcM4j0FpCQWhcKFujnZkcVUCG6iO80n5w@mail.gmail.com>

Really nice!

On 11 November 2014 16:01, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:

> Great stuff Corinne!!
>
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 3:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for native
> apps.
>
> Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
>
> http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0
>
> Enjoy!
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141111/4866d275/attachment.html 

From bdawidow at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 05:04:33 2014
From: bdawidow at redhat.com (Boleslaw Dawidowicz)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:04:33 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] Devoxx OAuth2
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAg5f2ROQW2o4gAyRmOC54EaGJDUJoT6A8n+XZ4ssGgF+-Z5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9E6E64AD-0A9A-4743-B1E9-121236600D10@redhat.com>

Wow? really awesome slides! 

> On 11 Nov 2014, at 09:34, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> last night our own Corinne Krych spoke at Devoxx about OAuth2 for native apps.
> 
> Her beautiful slides include AeroGear and Keycloak:
> http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0 <http://corinnekrych.github.io/OAuth2Devoxx/assets/player/KeynoteDHTMLPlayer.html#0>
> 
> Enjoy!
> -Matthias
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ <http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf <http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>_______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--
Boles?aw Dawidowicz
Supervisor, Software Engineering | Red Hat Middleware Security

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141112/4da61e9e/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Sat Nov 15 07:02:42 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:02:42 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production variant
Message-ID: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>

Hello,

after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.

When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.

But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already published in the store - same problem.

>From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production variants, so the devices are definitely registering.

The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the production variant). I?m sending the same message.

Any idea what could be wrong? 

Cheers,
Thomas



From matzew at apache.org  Sun Nov 16 03:30:18 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:30:18 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?

-Matthias

On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have
> now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>
> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web
> console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.
>
> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get sent
> (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are received on
> the devices. I tested this with two different apps already published in the
> store - same problem.
>
> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m
> testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push
> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production
> variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>
> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the
> production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>
> Any idea what could be wrong?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141116/c3710967/attachment.html 

From lukas.fryc at gmail.com  Sun Nov 16 05:39:40 2014
From: lukas.fryc at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBGcnnEjQ==?=)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:39:40 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEroY34fGELYGJxmasQq5ghXQ0OiDnny5P24GGhyouuA9CfU-w@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas,

you can be potentially hitting this issue that we got reported recently:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1087

~ L.

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have
>> now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>>
>> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web
>> console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.
>>
>> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get
>> sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are
>> received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already
>> published in the store - same problem.
>>
>> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m
>> testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push
>> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production
>> variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>>
>> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the
>> production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>>
>> Any idea what could be wrong?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141116/b7cc4770/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Sun Nov 16 11:57:19 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:57:19 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS
	Production	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>

Hi Matthias,

by ?token", I assume you mean ?device token?? 

With the 2 apps in question, I never registered a development variant, only a production variant per app.

One side effect of this could have been that during testing my development devices (running a debug build, i.e. not one downloaded from the app store) registered its device token on the production variant.

I?m not not sure whether my situation is similar to the one described in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1087  - If that?s the source of my problem, is there a workaround? Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue temporarily? (I?ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I want to push to 65.000 devices?)

Cheers,
Thomas


On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
> 
> -Matthias
> 
> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
> 
> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.
> 
> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already published in the store - same problem.
> 
> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
> 
> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the production variant). I?m sending the same message.
> 
> Any idea what could be wrong?
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141116/a22752ee/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141116/a22752ee/attachment-0001.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 02:28:44 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:28:44 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
>
> by ?token", I assume you mean ?device token??
>
> With the 2 apps in question, I never registered a development variant,
> only a production variant per app.
>
> One side effect of this could have been that during testing my development
> devices (running a debug build, i.e. not one downloaded from the app store)
> registered its device token on the production variant.
>
> I?m not not sure whether my situation is similar to the one described in
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1087  - If that?s the source of my
> problem, is there a workaround? Should I delete my development token(s)
> from the DB to solve the issue temporarily? (I?ve got a pretty important
> app launch coming up, where I want to push to 65.000 devices?)
>

yes, I think that's the work-around.

We will be looking into this!


>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
> On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have
>> now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>>
>> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web
>> console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.
>>
>> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get
>> sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are
>> received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already
>> published in the store - same problem.
>>
>> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m
>> testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push
>> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production
>> variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>>
>> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the
>> production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>>
>> Any idea what could be wrong?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/732ea513/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 17 04:32:01 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:32:01 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS
	Production	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>


On 17.11.2014, at 08:28, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue temporarily? (I?ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I want to push to 65.000 devices?)
> 
> yes, I think that's the work-around.

thanks

is it enough to 

DELETE FROM Installation WHERE deviceToken = ?<MyDevDeviceToken>"

or do i need to delete or update anything else? 

thx
t


> 
> We will be looking into this!
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
>> 
>> -Matthias
>> 
>> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>> 
>> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly.
>> 
>> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already published in the store - same problem.
>> 
>> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>> 
>> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>> 
>> Any idea what could be wrong?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/b5834e0c/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/b5834e0c/attachment.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 04:41:26 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:41:26 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>

That should be fine

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

>
> On 17.11.2014, at 08:28, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue
> temporarily? (I?ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I
> want to push to 65.000 devices?)
>
> yes, I think that's the work-around.
>
>
> thanks
>
> is it enough to
>
> DELETE FROM Installation WHERE deviceToken = ?<MyDevDeviceToken>"
>
> or do i need to delete or update anything else?
>
> thx
> t
>
>
>
> We will be looking into this!
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I
>>> have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>>>
>>> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the
>>> web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices
>>> properly.
>>>
>>> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get
>>> sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are
>>> received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already
>>> published in the store - same problem.
>>>
>>> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I?m
>>> testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push
>>> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production
>>> variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>>>
>>> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for
>>> the production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>>>
>>> Any idea what could be wrong?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/2d3811f8/attachment-0001.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 04:43:19 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:43:19 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>

another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> That should be fine
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17.11.2014, at 08:28, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue
>> temporarily? (I?ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I
>> want to push to 65.000 devices?)
>>
>> yes, I think that's the work-around.
>>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> is it enough to
>>
>> DELETE FROM Installation WHERE deviceToken = ?<MyDevDeviceToken>"
>>
>> or do i need to delete or update anything else?
>>
>> thx
>> t
>>
>>
>>
>> We will be looking into this!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant?
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I
>>>> have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices.
>>>>
>>>> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the
>>>> web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices
>>>> properly.
>>>>
>>>> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get
>>>> sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are
>>>> received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already
>>>> published in the store - same problem.
>>>>
>>>> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app
>>>> I?m testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push
>>>> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production
>>>> variants, so the devices are definitely registering.
>>>>
>>>> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for
>>>> the production variant). I?m sending the same message.
>>>>
>>>> Any idea what could be wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/7e1e4267/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Mon Nov 17 04:46:30 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:46:30 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS
	Production	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>


> another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)

Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/6b6a72ed/attachment.bin 

From scm.blanc at gmail.com  Mon Nov 17 05:36:34 2014
From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:36:34 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Thomas,
You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
installations" :


?
>From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.

Sebi


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

>
> > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
>
> Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/699317ed/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: installation.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7495 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/699317ed/attachment-0001.png 

From corinnekrych at gmail.com  Mon Nov 17 06:45:06 2014
From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:45:06 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>

Hello all

Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087

I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate

I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
- on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
- on iPad2 with dev certificate

When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification.

If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
=> Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.

Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140

The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further. 

++
Corinne



> On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" :
> 
> <installation.png>
> ?
> From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> 
> Sebi
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> 
> > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
> 
> Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users



From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 06:55:15 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:55:15 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Corrine,

thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing
tokens).

here is some code snippets:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code

I am currently on a train with a bad connection


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello all
>
> Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>
> I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
> Distribution certificate
>
> I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>
> When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD
> variant received the notification.
>
> If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent
> again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received
> the notification
> => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate
> thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the
> notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>
> Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
> called:
>
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>
> The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
> server locally to test further.
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
>
>
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
> installations" :
> >
> > <installation.png>
> > ?
> > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> >
> > Sebi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
> ;-)
> >
> > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin
> UI?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/08ebf7fd/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 06:56:28 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:56:28 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2Tzm4_dAEUK2uuEivkgMA2-2k55KyG+7xs27PLOsW1ccA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>


I also confirm that the work around does work.
>


please report back if that 'trick' works for you as well.

Thanks again, Corinne++

-M


>
> Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
> called:
>
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>
> The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
> server locally to test further.
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
>
>
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
> installations" :
> >
> > <installation.png>
> > ?
> > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> >
> > Sebi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
> ;-)
> >
> > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin
> UI?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/53242001/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 07:27:24 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:27:24 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Corrine,
>
> thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
> mixing tokens).
>
> here is some code snippets:
> https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>


perhaps like:
https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de



>
> I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all
>>
>> Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>>
>> I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>> Distribution certificate
>>
>> I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>> - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>> - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>>
>> When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
>> PROD variant received the notification.
>>
>> If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent
>> again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received
>> the notification
>> => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate
>> thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the
>> notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>>
>> Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
>> called:
>>
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>>
>> The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
>> server locally to test further.
>>
>> ++
>> Corinne
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
>> installations" :
>> >
>> > <installation.png>
>> > ?
>> > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>> >
>> > Sebi
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
>> ;-)
>> >
>> > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin
>> UI?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/ac893451/attachment-0001.html 

From corinnekrych at gmail.com  Mon Nov 17 09:45:00 2014
From: corinnekrych at gmail.com (Corinne Krych)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:45:00 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>

Adding a test as you suggested Matt
see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.

the output is:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0

I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc..

however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token.

@matthias does it help?

++
Corinne


> On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Corrine,
> 
> thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens).
> 
> here is some code snippets:
> https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> 
> 
> perhaps like:
> https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> 
>  
> 
> I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> 
> I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate
> 
> I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> 
> When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification.
> 
> If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
> => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
> 
> Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called:
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
> 
> The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further.
> 
> ++
> Corinne
> 
> 
> 
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" :
> >
> > <installation.png>
> > ?
> > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> >
> > Sebi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> >
> > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
> >
> > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users



From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 09:47:06 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:47:06 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2RacBtTz3Nk4d-p1Zsz0_bTHFgi1_=VyYsJ3t9irCaPEA@mail.gmail.com>

Corinne,

thanks for the update! That helps. Will get in touch with the java-apns
folks

-Matthias



On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
> see:
> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>
> the output is:
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>
> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
> failure, retry etc..
>
> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid
> token.
>
> @matthias does it help?
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
>
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Corrine,
> >
> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
> mixing tokens).
> >
> > here is some code snippets:
> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> >
> >
> > perhaps like:
> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> >
> >
> >
> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> >
> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
> Distribution certificate
> >
> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> >
> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
> PROD variant received the notification.
> >
> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent
> again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received
> the notification
> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
> >
> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
> called:
> >
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
> >
> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
> server locally to test further.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
> installations" :
> > >
> > > <installation.png>
> > > ?
> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
> ;-)
> > >
> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
> admin UI?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/18ab36cc/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Mon Nov 17 09:50:11 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:50:11 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2RacBtTz3Nk4d-p1Zsz0_bTHFgi1_=VyYsJ3t9irCaPEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RacBtTz3Nk4d-p1Zsz0_bTHFgi1_=VyYsJ3t9irCaPEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2T6kp++vKNdH2iaftg4YZ4kfrEDgcC=A+tZfj7ASfjqJg@mail.gmail.com>

looks like a known issue on java-apns:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-55071643

I will see what we can do to have a new release :)

-Matthias

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Corinne,
>
> thanks for the update! That helps. Will get in touch with the java-apns
> folks
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>> see:
>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
>> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>>
>> the output is:
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>>
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>
>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
>> failure, retry etc..
>>
>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid
>> token.
>>
>> @matthias does it help?
>>
>> ++
>> Corinne
>>
>>
>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Corrine,
>> >
>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on
>> java-apns...
>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
>> mixing tokens).
>> >
>> > here is some code snippets:
>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>> >
>> >
>> > perhaps like:
>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello all
>> >
>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>> >
>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>> Distribution certificate
>> >
>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>> >
>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
>> PROD variant received the notification.
>> >
>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and
>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini
>> received the notification
>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>> >
>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback
>> is called:
>> >
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>> >
>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
>> server locally to test further.
>> >
>> > ++
>> > Corinne
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
>> installations" :
>> > >
>> > > <installation.png>
>> > > ?
>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>> > >
>> > > Sebi
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin
>> UI ;-)
>> > >
>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
>> admin UI?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141117/edc56f35/attachment-0001.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 18 06:02:30 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:02:30 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>

what JDK version do you have ?

I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk

I am unable to reproduce this behavior....

I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:



.withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
"XXXX").withProductionDestination()


and I give it too tokens:
iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)

Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the ordering
of the tokens does not matter ..









On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
> see:
> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>
> the output is:
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>
> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
> failure, retry etc..
>
> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid
> token.
>
> @matthias does it help?
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
>
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Corrine,
> >
> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
> mixing tokens).
> >
> > here is some code snippets:
> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> >
> >
> > perhaps like:
> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> >
> >
> >
> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> >
> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
> Distribution certificate
> >
> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> >
> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
> PROD variant received the notification.
> >
> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent
> again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received
> the notification
> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
> >
> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
> called:
> >
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
> >
> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
> server locally to test further.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
> installations" :
> > >
> > > <installation.png>
> > > ?
> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
> ;-)
> > >
> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
> admin UI?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/1ee3561c/attachment.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 18 06:27:10 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:27:10 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>
messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0



On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> what JDK version do you have ?
>
> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>
> I am unable to reproduce this behavior....
>
> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>
>
>
> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
> "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>
>
> and I give it too tokens:
> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>
> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the
> ordering of the tokens does not matter ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>> see:
>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
>> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>>
>> the output is:
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>>
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>
>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
>> failure, retry etc..
>>
>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid
>> token.
>>
>> @matthias does it help?
>>
>> ++
>> Corinne
>>
>>
>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Corrine,
>> >
>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on
>> java-apns...
>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
>> mixing tokens).
>> >
>> > here is some code snippets:
>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>> >
>> >
>> > perhaps like:
>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello all
>> >
>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>> >
>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>> Distribution certificate
>> >
>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>> >
>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
>> PROD variant received the notification.
>> >
>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and
>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini
>> received the notification
>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>> >
>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback
>> is called:
>> >
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>> >
>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
>> server locally to test further.
>> >
>> > ++
>> > Corinne
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
>> installations" :
>> > >
>> > > <installation.png>
>> > > ?
>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>> > >
>> > > Sebi
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin
>> UI ;-)
>> > >
>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
>> admin UI?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/bffaa876/attachment-0001.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 18 08:57:25 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:57:25 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas,

I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to
reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version
(1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun
her tests.

In the meantime, what is your version?

Greetings,
Matthias

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
>
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>
> messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> what JDK version do you have ?
>>
>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>>
>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior....
>>
>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>>
>>
>>
>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
>> "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>>
>>
>> and I give it too tokens:
>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>>
>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the
>> ordering of the tokens does not matter ..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>>> see:
>>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
>>> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>>>
>>> the output is:
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>>>
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>>
>>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
>>> failure, retry etc..
>>>
>>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid
>>> token.
>>>
>>> @matthias does it help?
>>>
>>> ++
>>> Corinne
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>> > Hi Corrine,
>>> >
>>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on
>>> java-apns...
>>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
>>> mixing tokens).
>>> >
>>> > here is some code snippets:
>>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > perhaps like:
>>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <
>>> corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hello all
>>> >
>>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>>> >
>>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>>> Distribution certificate
>>> >
>>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>>> >
>>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
>>> PROD variant received the notification.
>>> >
>>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and
>>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini
>>> received the notification
>>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
>>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
>>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>>> >
>>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback
>>> is called:
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>>> >
>>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS
>>> server locally to test further.
>>> >
>>> > ++
>>> > Corinne
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi Thomas,
>>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
>>> installations" :
>>> > >
>>> > > <installation.png>
>>> > > ?
>>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>>> > >
>>> > > Sebi
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin
>>> UI ;-)
>>> > >
>>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
>>> admin UI?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/8b328e41/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Tue Nov 18 11:02:51 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:02:51 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS
	Production	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <801AB699-33BA-48AC-9173-ABA040B04ACB@me.com>

Hi Matthias,

java version "1.7.0_71"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)

(I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I didn?t configure anything specific).

Cheers,
T


On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun her tests.
> 
> In the meantime, what is your version?
> 
> Greetings,
> Matthias
> 
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
> 
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> what JDK version do you have ? 
> 
> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
> 
> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... 
> 
> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
> 
> 
> 
> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
> 
> 
> and I give it too tokens:
> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) 
> 
> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the ordering of the tokens does not matter .. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
> see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
> 
> the output is:
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
> 
> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc..
> 
> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token.
> 
> @matthias does it help?
> 
> ++
> Corinne
> 
> 
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Corrine,
> >
> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens).
> >
> > here is some code snippets:
> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> >
> >
> > perhaps like:
> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> >
> >
> >
> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> >
> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate
> >
> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> >
> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification.
> >
> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
> >
> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called:
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
> >
> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" :
> > >
> > > <installation.png>
> > > ?
> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
> > >
> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/f9b53835/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/f9b53835/attachment-0001.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 18 11:04:39 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:04:39 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <801AB699-33BA-48AC-9173-ABA040B04ACB@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<801AB699-33BA-48AC-9173-ABA040B04ACB@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2SRSdbLwfshVBppNm_o+a9NPsMOe0Yz0zZ7hm3kwhP2+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi thomas,

here is an update on the actual issue:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965

I will file a PR for that

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
>
> java version "1.7.0_71"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)
>
> (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I
> didn?t configure anything specific).
>
> Cheers,
> T
>
>
> On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thomas,
>
> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to
> reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version
> (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun
> her tests.
>
> In the meantime, what is your version?
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
>>
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>
>> messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> what JDK version do you have ?
>>>
>>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>>>
>>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior....
>>>
>>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
>>> "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>>>
>>>
>>> and I give it too tokens:
>>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>>>
>>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the
>>> ordering of the tokens does not matter ..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>>>> see:
>>>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>>>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
>>>> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>>>>
>>>> the output is:
>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed:
>>>> INVALID_TOKEN
>>>>
>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>>>
>>>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
>>>> failure, retry etc..
>>>>
>>>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the
>>>> valid token.
>>>>
>>>> @matthias does it help?
>>>>
>>>> ++
>>>> Corinne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Corrine,
>>>> >
>>>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on
>>>> java-apns...
>>>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
>>>> mixing tokens).
>>>> >
>>>> > here is some code snippets:
>>>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > perhaps like:
>>>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <
>>>> corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hello all
>>>> >
>>>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>>>> >
>>>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>>>> Distribution certificate
>>>> >
>>>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>>>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>>>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>>>> >
>>>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the
>>>> PROD variant received the notification.
>>>> >
>>>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and
>>>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini
>>>> received the notification
>>>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
>>>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
>>>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>>>> >
>>>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback
>>>> is called:
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>>>> >
>>>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a
>>>> UPS server locally to test further.
>>>> >
>>>> > ++
>>>> > Corinne
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hi Thomas,
>>>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
>>>> installations" :
>>>> > >
>>>> > > <installation.png>
>>>> > > ?
>>>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Sebi
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin
>>>> UI ;-)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
>>>> admin UI?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>> >
>>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>> >
>>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/0cbcb6f6/attachment.html 

From thomers at me.com  Tue Nov 18 11:14:37 2014
From: thomers at me.com (Thomas Schweitzer)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:14:37 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS
	Production	variant
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2SRSdbLwfshVBppNm_o+a9NPsMOe0Yz0zZ7hm3kwhP2+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<801AB699-33BA-48AC-9173-ABA040B04ACB@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SRSdbLwfshVBppNm_o+a9NPsMOe0Yz0zZ7hm3kwhP2+A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5623DBCF-135C-48C2-86C3-8EE644301BC6@me.com>

Thanks for the update Matthias!

On 18.11.2014, at 17:04, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Hi thomas,
> 
> here is an update on the actual issue:
> https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965
> 
> I will file a PR for that
> 
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> java version "1.7.0_71"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)
> 
> (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I didn?t configure anything specific).
> 
> Cheers,
> T
> 
> 
> On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Thomas,
>> 
>> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun her tests.
>> 
>> In the meantime, what is your version?
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
>> 
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> what JDK version do you have ? 
>> 
>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>> 
>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... 
>> 
>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>> 
>> 
>> and I give it too tokens:
>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) 
>> 
>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the ordering of the tokens does not matter .. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>> see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>> 
>> the output is:
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>> 
>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc..
>> 
>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token.
>> 
>> @matthias does it help?
>> 
>> ++
>> Corinne
>> 
>> 
>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Corrine,
>> >
>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens).
>> >
>> > here is some code snippets:
>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>> >
>> >
>> > perhaps like:
>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello all
>> >
>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>> >
>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate
>> >
>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>> >
>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification.
>> >
>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>> >
>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called:
>> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>> >
>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further.
>> >
>> > ++
>> > Corinne
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" :
>> > >
>> > > <installation.png>
>> > > ?
>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>> > >
>> > > Sebi
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
>> > >
>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/7cc2a1f3/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/7cc2a1f3/attachment-0001.bin 

From matzew at apache.org  Tue Nov 18 11:31:35 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:31:35 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production
	variant
In-Reply-To: <5623DBCF-135C-48C2-86C3-8EE644301BC6@me.com>
References: <50D409AE-1815-45EE-B2F1-9DFD34C0D60D@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SyTtzcXHD+EYX9VASv_qS8-xTeVWxwn-tk1VwEM+cZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<DB102FC0-D803-4ECE-8627-55BB0F921812@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2RYyx4cxWaB-=3Woj51duhS4G0i1q_Ti3yAmPhn8t_ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEAEC8E5-001C-4E18-86F4-D746EE9729CA@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2Ry7DC4qZR3uoyXjkaH7bkh41uM+6XPY_EHH3_XdfhYQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2RUCK2Q2R5qz0E5PWD=f9RACc+CNKKxmLQiiFGm7xXh-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<67D69F17-7E34-4E30-9D9F-2D39C0C65685@me.com>
	<CAD_dpu1OsQiLz7KnkpTKeUTagcUwC2+zOf7SWtzn-U5xnb6o7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<AAD6844D-A1BB-4D2B-A59D-EE10150498BD@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TwVsVKoxOenedbQKFKBbugcZ2N94XMd9ttrPX9dZjPrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2Td9i=tS1k8dcrHSLHx6NnQhanmZcmLka=O9soYt=+LKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<84B1DC90-7AAB-4A14-81FE-A493A2E386E6@gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2S360=uO3ZwTD=Nz=c_1exuNYadc1fPaS00E4Cr=gNQmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2TkimBhjpcPVcEoeKm_P0jatX1O4mfa+=v0GyV7oXeXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAg5f2QjSLE5JriF4wLuy4dAkBovTbzW6G0LvSYtEDmR8tXA3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<801AB699-33BA-48AC-9173-ABA040B04ACB@me.com>
	<CAAg5f2SRSdbLwfshVBppNm_o+a9NPsMOe0Yz0zZ7hm3kwhP2+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5623DBCF-135C-48C2-86C3-8EE644301BC6@me.com>
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2SByDahymsWFTjAEF-z5OPEtKBv+RtBgM3g=MbDkNaS5g@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas,

here is the PR
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/436

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the update Matthias!
>
> On 18.11.2014, at 17:04, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi thomas,
>
> here is an update on the actual issue:
> https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965
>
> I will file a PR for that
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> java version "1.7.0_71"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
>> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)
>>
>> (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I
>> didn?t configure anything specific).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> T
>>
>>
>> On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to
>> reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version
>> (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun
>> her tests.
>>
>> In the meantime, what is your version?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
>>>
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed:
>>> INVALID_TOKEN
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>
>>> messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> what JDK version do you have ?
>>>>
>>>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>>>>
>>>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior....
>>>>
>>>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
>>>> "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and I give it too tokens:
>>>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>>>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>>>>
>>>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the
>>>> ordering of the tokens does not matter ..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
>>>>> see:
>>>>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
>>>>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated ?prod mixed
>>>>> variant list? and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>>>>>
>>>>> the output is:
>>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
>>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed:
>>>>> INVALID_TOKEN
>>>>>
>>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
>>>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>>>>>
>>>>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success,
>>>>> failure, retry etc..
>>>>>
>>>>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the
>>>>> valid token.
>>>>>
>>>>> @matthias does it help?
>>>>>
>>>>> ++
>>>>> Corinne
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Corrine,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on
>>>>> java-apns...
>>>>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like
>>>>> mixing tokens).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > here is some code snippets:
>>>>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > perhaps like:
>>>>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <
>>>>> corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > Hello all
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with
>>>>> Distribution certificate
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
>>>>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
>>>>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
>>>>> >
>>>>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on
>>>>> the PROD variant received the notification.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and
>>>>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini
>>>>> received the notification
>>>>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid
>>>>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not
>>>>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed
>>>>> callback is called:
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a
>>>>> UPS server locally to test further.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ++
>>>>> > Corinne
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hi Thomas,
>>>>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of
>>>>> "x installations" :
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > <installation.png>
>>>>> > > ?
>>>>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Sebi
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <
>>>>> thomers at me.com> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the
>>>>> Admin UI ;-)
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the
>>>>> admin UI?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>>> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>> >
>>>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>> >
>>>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>>> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>  _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/cdf96d22/attachment-0001.html 

From matzew at apache.org  Sat Nov 22 07:56:57 2014
From: matzew at apache.org (Matthias Wessendorf)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:56:57 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] UnifiedPush Server and WildFly 8.2.0.Final
Message-ID: <CAAg5f2RJhhQtD4DV9=1XjGxW2dtbXMjB23SXgynOc87SW8TMmQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I tested the 1.0.x and master against the new WildFly 8.2.0.Final release
-> works fine.

Hopefully we are able to get WildFly 8.2.0.Final on to our community
cartridge for Openshift soon as well.

-Matthias

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141122/ffaa9133/attachment.html 

From scm.blanc at gmail.com  Sat Nov 22 09:04:51 2014
From: scm.blanc at gmail.com (Sebastien Blanc)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:04:51 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] UnifiedPush Server and WildFly 8.2.0.Final
In-Reply-To: <CAAg5f2RJhhQtD4DV9=1XjGxW2dtbXMjB23SXgynOc87SW8TMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAg5f2RJhhQtD4DV9=1XjGxW2dtbXMjB23SXgynOc87SW8TMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD_dpu3jrMmB-WwkhV2ZhGyLvrOjWcc_GUoEJsPjXTVcQrHJ+w@mail.gmail.com>

Same here, spent the day yesterday on WF 8.2 for my import/export tests, no
issues :)


On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tested the 1.0.x and master against the new WildFly 8.2.0.Final release
> -> works fine.
>
> Hopefully we are able to get WildFly 8.2.0.Final on to our community
> cartridge for Openshift soon as well.
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141122/aa44fba7/attachment.html 

From ameetranjan at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 01:44:51 2014
From: ameetranjan at gmail.com (Amit Ranjan)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:14:51 +0530
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Unable to resolve realm public key remotely
In-Reply-To: <CAK_2o5KVuY4TnjidADiYFUAm5J6W+SqcpDDYC8=SNkVz1fPkAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK_2o5KVuY4TnjidADiYFUAm5J6W+SqcpDDYC8=SNkVz1fPkAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK_2o5Kp_LwJGkQJOmihJSPPic_BG_zYFDU3OwwTSLmU66=gYg@mail.gmail.com>

I am able to access auth page https://ip:8443/auth....but when I try to
access ag-push I get the above exception.

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Amit Ranjan <ameetranjan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have deployed aerogear 1.0.2 on wildfly-8.1.0.Final. Server is up and
> running. However when i try to access it through my browser
> https://ip:8443/ag-push, I get following exception, Would be thankful if
> anyone can help me resolve this
>
> 11:54:25,585 ERROR [io.undertow.request] (default task-1) UT005023:
> Exception handling request to /ag-push/index.htm:
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve realm public key remotely
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveRealmKey(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:94)
> [keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveDeployment(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:55)
> [keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletKeycloakAuthMech.authenticate(ServletKeycloakAuthMech.java:54)
> [keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.transition(SecurityContextImpl.java:281)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.transition(SecurityContextImpl.java:298)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.access$100(SecurityContextImpl.java:268)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.attemptAuthentication(SecurityContextImpl.java:131)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.authTransition(SecurityContextImpl.java:106)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.authenticate(SecurityContextImpl.java:99)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.handleRequest(ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.java:54)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationConstraintHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationConstraintHandler.java:51)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractConfidentialityHandler.handleRequest(AbstractConfidentialityHandler.java:45)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.java:61)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.java:56)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.java:58)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.handleRequest(CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.java:70)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.security.handlers.SecurityInitialHandler.handleRequest(SecurityInitialHandler.java:76)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(JACCContextIdHandler.java:61)
>         at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.handleRequest(ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.java:69)
> [keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.handleRequest(ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.java:69)
> [keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         at
> io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:240)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:227)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:73)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:146)
> [undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:177)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:727)
> [undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
> Caused by: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException: Connection to
> https://125.21.243.59:8443 refused
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnection(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:190)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.conn.AbstractPoolEntry.open(AbstractPoolEntry.java:151)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.conn.AbstractPooledConnAdapter.open(AbstractPooledConnAdapter.java:125)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.tryConnect(DefaultRequestDirector.java:640)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:479)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:906)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:805)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:784)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveRealmKey(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:65)
> [keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
>         ... 32 more
> Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
>         at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:339)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:200)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at
> java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:182)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:391)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:579)
> [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.connect(SSLSocketImpl.java:618)
> [jsse.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
>         at
> org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLSocketFactory.java:549)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         at
> org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnection(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:180)
> [httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
>         ... 40 more
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> --
> Amit Ranjan
>
>


-- 
Amit Ranjan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141127/a60f66f8/attachment.html 

From ameetranjan at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 01:34:02 2014
From: ameetranjan at gmail.com (Amit Ranjan)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:04:02 +0530
Subject: [Aerogear-users] Unable to resolve realm public key remotely
Message-ID: <CAK_2o5KVuY4TnjidADiYFUAm5J6W+SqcpDDYC8=SNkVz1fPkAQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
I have deployed aerogear 1.0.2 on wildfly-8.1.0.Final. Server is up and
running. However when i try to access it through my browser
https://ip:8443/ag-push, I get following exception, Would be thankful if
anyone can help me resolve this

11:54:25,585 ERROR [io.undertow.request] (default task-1) UT005023:
Exception handling request to /ag-push/index.htm:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve realm public key remotely
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveRealmKey(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:94)
[keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveDeployment(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:55)
[keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletKeycloakAuthMech.authenticate(ServletKeycloakAuthMech.java:54)
[keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.transition(SecurityContextImpl.java:281)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.transition(SecurityContextImpl.java:298)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl$AuthAttempter.access$100(SecurityContextImpl.java:268)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.attemptAuthentication(SecurityContextImpl.java:131)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.authTransition(SecurityContextImpl.java:106)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.impl.SecurityContextImpl.authenticate(SecurityContextImpl.java:99)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.handleRequest(ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.java:54)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationConstraintHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationConstraintHandler.java:51)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractConfidentialityHandler.handleRequest(AbstractConfidentialityHandler.java:45)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.java:61)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletSecurityConstraintHandler.java:56)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.java:58)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.handleRequest(CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.java:70)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.security.handlers.SecurityInitialHandler.handleRequest(SecurityInitialHandler.java:76)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(JACCContextIdHandler.java:61)
        at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.handleRequest(ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.java:69)
[keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.undertow.ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.handleRequest(ServletPreAuthActionsHandler.java:69)
[keycloak-undertow-adapter-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:25)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:240)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:227)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:73)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:146)
[undertow-servlet-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:177)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:727)
[undertow-core-1.0.15.Final.jar:1.0.15.Final]
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) [rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
Caused by: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException: Connection to
https://125.21.243.59:8443 refused
        at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnection(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:190)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.AbstractPoolEntry.open(AbstractPoolEntry.java:151)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.AbstractPooledConnAdapter.open(AbstractPooledConnAdapter.java:125)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.tryConnect(DefaultRequestDirector.java:640)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultRequestDirector.java:479)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:906)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:805)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpClient.java:784)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.keycloak.adapters.AdapterDeploymentContext.resolveRealmKey(AdapterDeploymentContext.java:65)
[keycloak-adapter-core-1.0.4.Final.jar:]
        ... 32 more
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.doConnect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:339)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:200)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at
java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.connect(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:182)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:391)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:579)
[rt.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.connect(SSLSocketImpl.java:618)
[jsse.jar:1.7.0_09-icedtea]
        at
org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLSocketFactory.java:549)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnection(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:180)
[httpclient-4.2.1.jar:4.2.1]
        ... 40 more

Thanks and Regards

-- 
Amit Ranjan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141127/475ea01e/attachment-0001.html 

From lukas.fryc at gmail.com  Thu Nov 27 08:41:44 2014
From: lukas.fryc at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?THVrw6HFoSBGcnnEjQ==?=)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:41:44 +0100
Subject: [Aerogear-users] [Poll] New Visual Style for UnifiedPush Server -
	Colours
Message-ID: <CAEroY35wQtimimuyWqFqPCkMOQPe3ZLhp61gZdONzwYWEKF7qA@mail.gmail.com>

Hey guys,

some time ago Gabriel prepared us a new scheme that we had two issues with
(that I won't mention so I won't influence your opinion). ;-)

Andres now took this proposal one step further and prepared several options.


You can vote for your favorite here, and leave any additional comments if
required:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s8vs9lXlD8sE4rOWje0qGBzrzeZofSLhtWxGvf-TWdw/viewform?usp=send_form



Thanks!

~ Lukas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141127/abe8167f/attachment.html