[Aerogear-users] Cannot receives pushes via iOS Production variant

Thomas Schweitzer thomers at me.com
Tue Nov 18 11:02:51 EST 2014 

Hi Matthias,

java version "1.7.0_71"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)

(I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I didn’t configure anything specific).

Cheers,
T


On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun her tests.
> 
> In the meantime, what is your version?
> 
> Greetings,
> Matthias
> 
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
> 
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> what JDK version do you have ? 
> 
> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
> 
> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... 
> 
> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
> 
> 
> 
> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", "XXXX").withProductionDestination()
> 
> 
> and I give it too tokens:
> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) 
> 
> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the ordering of the tokens does not matter .. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
> see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.variant.similation/src/test/java/com/notnoop/apns/APNSTest.java#L31
> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
> 
> the output is:
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B at 143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
> 
> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc..
> 
> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token.
> 
> @matthias does it help?
> 
> ++
> Corinne
> 
> 
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Corrine,
> >
> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens).
> >
> > here is some code snippets:
> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> >
> >
> > perhaps like:
> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> >
> >
> >
> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> >
> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate
> >
> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> >
> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification.
> >
> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work.
> >
> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called:
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/message/SenderServiceImpl.java#L140
> >
> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" :
> > >
> > > <installation.png>
> > > ​
> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers at me.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)
> > >
> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/f9b53835/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20141118/f9b53835/attachment-0001.bin

More information about the Aerogear-users mailing list