[Aerogear-users] UnifiedPush Node sender move to Promises

[Luke Holmquist]

Hello peeps,

I've just released the 0.13.0 version for the sender,
https://www.npmjs.com/package/unifiedpush-node-sender

The api has changed a bit, so please check out the example to see the
changes.

Also note that node version 4 or greater is required here


I will probably think about doing a 1.0.0 release soon once people have had
a chance to check out the changes


On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

> for those following along at home:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1621
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it would be good for the community to move forward and use
>>> latest technology. Node 0.12 is already very old, given the current version
>>> is 6.
>>>
>>> How about getting promisses in, and afterwards release this as a 1.0.0
>>> release ?
>>>
>>
>> i think this sounds like a plan,
>>
>> /me goes and creates a JIRA
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello people,
>>>>
>>>> I think i would like to move the unifiedpush-node-sender,
>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client ,  to
>>>> be Promise based.
>>>>
>>>> Currently it uses callback pattern that many node.js packages use as
>>>> well as emitting events.
>>>>
>>>> When i first created this 3 years ago, that was sort of the standard
>>>> way of doing things,  but Promises have become very popular(i know i love
>>>> them :)) and have been a native feature since node 0.12.x
>>>>
>>>> considering we have not yet hit a 1.0.0, we can pretty much just make
>>>> this change and we will be ok.
>>>>
>>>> If this is to big of a change all at once, we could always do both
>>>> callbacks and Promises.  I think we did this for Datamanager in the past.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps once we fully move to promises, then we can hit a 1.0.0
>>>>
>>>> My only concern is other projects that might be using the sender that
>>>> are not yet on node 0.12 or above, since this is when promises became
>>>> native.  I would really like to not have to include the polyfill.
>>>>
>>>> i suppose those users would need to stick to the previous versions then.
>>>>
>>>> anyway,  would like to hear some thoughts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Luke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20160606/8186f718/attachment-0001.html