[arquillian-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (ARQ-201) Primitive fields annotated with @Resource are not assigned

Aslak Knutsen (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Sat Jul 17 05:39:53 EDT 2010


    [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12539759#action_12539759 ] 

Aslak Knutsen commented on ARQ-201:
-----------------------------------

The reason for checking for null is to see if another Enricher has all ready set the field. E.g. The CDI enricher can handle @Resource better then we can. 

So for primitives, which is the lesser evil?

- Always try to lookup primitives, since we can't really determine if they have been set or not?
- Assume a primitive with it's default value (0) is not set, even tho that could be it's real value?
- Fail/Report error/warning, primitives not supported. Who binds/needs primitives anyway? :)



> Primitive fields annotated with @Resource are not assigned
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARQ-201
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-201
>             Project: Arquillian
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime Enricher SPI
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha2
>            Reporter: Dan Allen
>            Assignee: Aslak Knutsen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0.Alpha3
>
>
> Fields which are not null are skipped when performing @Resource injections. However, primitive fields are never null and therefore injections do not occur on those fields.
> Example:
> @Resource(name = "port") int port;

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the arquillian-issues mailing list