[bv-dev] Constructor validation
Michael Nascimento
misterm at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 20:11:33 EST 2011
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gunnar Morling
<gunnar.morling at googlemail.com> wrote:
> In HV we are currently allowing to define additional return value
> constraints on methods overridden in sub types, and so far I haven't
> heard of any problems with that. AFAICS that's also what most
> programming by contract solutions do.
This makes a lot of sense to me. It should be supported. Constraints
on parameters of overriding methods shouldn't, following the same
reasoning already discussed.
Regards,
Michael
More information about the beanvalidation-dev
mailing list